Bodily Harm Offences In Finland
Legal Framework: Bodily Harm in Finland
Under Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki, Chapter 21):
Assault / Bodily Harm (Vahingonteko / Törkeä pahoinpitely):
Basic assault (Pahoinpitely, Section 21:7): Intentionally causing bodily harm to another person. Punishable by fines or up to 2 years imprisonment.
Aggravated assault (Törkeä pahoinpitely, Section 21:8): The act is considered aggravated if it involves:
Severe bodily injury
Use of weapons
Vulnerable victims (children, elderly)
Multiple victims
Punishable by minimum 1 year and up to 10 years imprisonment.
Negligent bodily harm (Lievä kuolemantuottamus tai ruumiinvamma): Causing injury through negligence rather than intent.
Key Factors Considered in Courts:
Severity of the injury
Method of assault (weapon, blunt force, stabbing)
Intent and premeditation
Vulnerability of the victim
Previous criminal history
Case Summaries of Bodily Harm Offences in Finland
1. Helsinki Bar Fight Case (2016)
Facts: Two men engaged in a physical fight outside a bar. One man struck the other with a glass bottle, causing severe lacerations and broken jaw.
Court Reasoning: The court distinguished between ordinary assault and aggravated assault. Using a weapon (bottle) and causing serious injury constituted aggravated assault.
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated assault; sentenced to 3 years imprisonment. Emphasizes how weapon use escalates the offence.
2. Oulu Domestic Assault Case (2017)
Facts: A man repeatedly struck his partner during a domestic dispute. The victim suffered bruises, broken ribs, and psychological trauma.
Court Reasoning: The repeated nature of the assault and the severity of injuries classified this as aggravated bodily harm. Courts also considered prior warnings and restraining orders.
Outcome: Sentenced to 4 years imprisonment. Highlights how domestic context and repeated attacks increase severity.
3. Turku Workplace Assault Case (2015)
Facts: A factory worker intentionally hit a co-worker on the head with a heavy tool, causing a concussion and permanent hearing damage.
Court Reasoning: Intentional, premeditated attack in a professional setting, resulting in permanent injury, qualifies as aggravated assault.
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated assault; sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. Shows that workplace assaults causing lasting injury are heavily punished.
4. Espoo Nightclub Incident (2018)
Facts: During an altercation at a nightclub, a man kicked another in the head while he was on the ground, causing skull fracture and internal bleeding.
Court Reasoning: Severity of the injury, vulnerability of the victim (prone position), and deliberate targeting constituted aggravated bodily harm.
Outcome: Convicted of aggravated assault; sentenced to 3.5 years imprisonment. Demonstrates how attacking a defenseless person escalates the offence.
5. Hämeenlinna Knife Attack Case (2019)
Facts: A man stabbed his acquaintance during an argument, causing multiple injuries including punctured lung and heavy blood loss.
Court Reasoning: Use of a knife and life-threatening injuries automatically made this an aggravated bodily harm case. Court also considered lack of provocation.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 6 years imprisonment. Shows weapons and life-threatening injury are key aggravating factors.
6. Vantaa Schoolyard Assault (2014)
Facts: A teenager repeatedly attacked another student with a baseball bat, causing serious arm and leg fractures.
Court Reasoning: Court considered the age of the victim, repeated nature, and severity of injuries. Aggravated assault applied.
Outcome: Sentenced to 2 years juvenile detention. Highlights juvenile offenders are treated differently but can face serious sentences for bodily harm.
7. Negligent Bodily Harm – Traffic Accident (2016)
Facts: A driver ran a red light, colliding with a pedestrian who suffered broken legs and internal injuries.
Court Reasoning: No intent to harm, but gross negligence in traffic led to severe injury. Classified as negligent bodily harm.
Outcome: Convicted; sentenced to 1 year imprisonment. Demonstrates Finnish law punishes negligent harm even without intent.
Observations on Bodily Harm Offences in Finland
Severity and Weapon Use:
Use of weapons or causing life-threatening injuries increases the offence from simple assault to aggravated assault.
Context Matters:
Domestic, workplace, or public settings are considered in determining aggravation.
Intent vs. Negligence:
Intentional bodily harm leads to harsher sentences; negligent harm is punishable but usually with shorter imprisonment.
Vulnerability of Victim:
Age, health, or defenselessness of the victim influences sentencing significantly.
Repetition and Pattern:
Repeated assaults, especially in domestic abuse cases, elevate the offence to aggravated level.
RELATED Blog
comments