Criminal Complaint Can Be Amended Even After Cognizance: SC
Criminal Complaint Can Be Amended Even After Cognizance: Supreme Court Position
Key Concepts:
Cognizance of Offence:
Cognizance means the court has formally taken notice of the offence and decided to proceed with the trial.
It usually happens under Section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) after receiving a complaint or police report.
Amendment of Complaint:
Amendment means making changes or corrections in the complaint filed.
Amendments may include adding or deleting charges, correcting facts, or including additional offences.
Legal Issue:
Whether a complaint can be amended after the court has taken cognizance and initiated the judicial process.
This question is important because parties may want to modify the complaint to ensure all relevant facts and offences are properly before the court.
Supreme Court’s Rationale:
The Court has recognized that the purpose of criminal proceedings is to serve justice, not to defeat it on technicalities.
Amendments are allowed to ensure that all material facts are properly presented to the court.
Even after cognizance, the court has the power to allow amendment to prevent miscarriage of justice.
The amendment should not cause prejudice to the accused in a way that is unfair or unjust.
The Court will consider whether the amendment changes the nature or gravity of the offence or results in unfair surprise.
Relevant Case Law:
1. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992) Supp (1) SCC 335
The Supreme Court discussed the principles guiding the taking of cognizance and emphasized that courts should focus on substance rather than form.
It acknowledged the flexibility of the courts to allow amendments to ensure justice.
2. K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962) AIR 605
The Court observed that courts have inherent powers to amend charges or complaints to reflect the true nature of the offence.
Amendments should be allowed if they facilitate fair trial and proper adjudication.
3. Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2013) 4 SCC 1
This case emphasized the importance of proper investigation and filing of complaints but also allowed procedural flexibility for amendments.
4. Ramashanker v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1970) AIR 2221
The Court held that amendments in criminal proceedings can be permitted at any stage to prevent injustice, unless it causes unfair prejudice to the accused.
Legal Provisions Supporting Amendment:
Section 152 of CrPC gives courts inherent power to amend errors in processes or documents.
Section 219 CrPC allows the court to alter charges as new facts emerge.
The courts have a wide discretion to amend complaints or charges to meet ends of justice.
Conditions for Allowing Amendments After Cognizance:
No unfair prejudice should be caused to the accused.
Amendment should be relevant and connected to the original complaint.
Amendment should not change the fundamental nature of the offence.
The interests of justice and fairness should guide the decision.
Summary:
The Supreme Court allows amendments to criminal complaints even after cognizance is taken.
This power is exercised to ensure justice is done and to correct any defects or omissions in the complaint.
Amendments should be balanced against the right of the accused to a fair trial.
The principle ensures that procedural technicalities do not defeat the substantive justice of the case.
RELATED Blog
0 comments