Legislative Reforms In Criminal Law
Legislative Reforms in Criminal Law in India – Detailed Overview
Criminal law in India is primarily governed by three major statutes:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Over time, multiple reforms have been introduced to make criminal law more responsive to societal changes, ensure speedy justice, strengthen victim rights, and improve the effectiveness of investigation and prosecution.
✅ Key Legislative Reforms in Criminal Law
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
Triggered by the Nirbhaya case (2012 Delhi gang rape).
Introduced new offenses: stalking (Sec 354D), voyeurism (Sec 354C), disrobing (Sec 354B), acid attacks (Sec 326A, 326B).
Changed the definition of rape (Sec 375 IPC).
Increased punishments and introduced death penalty for certain offenses.
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2018
Introduced the death penalty for rape of a girl under 12 years (Sec 376AB).
Set strict timelines for investigation (2 months) and trial (2 months).
Strengthened provisions related to bail and anticipatory bail in rape cases.
Decriminalization and Rationalization (e.g., Sec 377 IPC partially struck down)
Focused on removing archaic and discriminatory provisions (e.g., homosexuality decriminalized).
Sec 497 (Adultery) also decriminalized in 2018.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (To replace IPC from July 2024) – Aimed at restructuring Indian criminal laws, removing colonial hangovers, and ensuring victim-centric justice.
Case Laws That Influenced or Reflected Criminal Law Reforms
Let’s now discuss six landmark case laws in detail that shaped or reflected legislative reforms in criminal law.
1. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
Facts: Bhanwari Devi, a social worker, was gang-raped in Rajasthan while preventing a child marriage.
Issue: There were no specific laws dealing with sexual harassment at the workplace.
Judgment: The Supreme Court laid down the Vishaka Guidelines, mandating preventive and redressal mechanisms for workplace sexual harassment.
Impact:
Led to the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013.
Marked the expansion of criminal jurisprudence to workplace safety for women.
2. Nirbhaya Case – Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020)
Facts: Brutal gang rape and murder of a young woman in Delhi (2012).
Issue: Public outrage highlighted inadequacies in laws protecting women.
Judgment:
All four adult accused were convicted and sentenced to death.
The Court emphasized the "rarest of rare" doctrine.
Impact:
Immediate legislative response: Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
Reforms in rape laws, mandatory registration of FIR, and creation of fast-track courts.
3. Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018)
Facts: Challenge to Section 497 IPC, which criminalized adultery committed by a man with a married woman.
Judgment:
Declared Sec 497 IPC unconstitutional.
Held that the law was discriminatory and violated Articles 14, 15, and 21.
Impact:
Decriminalized adultery as a criminal offense.
Reflected the trend toward individual liberty and gender equality in criminal law.
4. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)
Facts: Constitutional challenge to Section 377 IPC, which criminalized consensual homosexual acts.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court struck down the portion of Sec 377 criminalizing consensual same-sex relationships.
Held that it violated dignity, privacy, and equality.
Impact:
Significant human rights-based reform.
Decriminalized homosexuality and reinforced principles of non-discrimination in criminal law.
5. Shakti Vahini v. Union of India (2018)
Facts: Writ petition against honour killings and the role of Khap Panchayats.
Judgment:
The Court issued guidelines to curb honour killings.
Directed states to create special cells and fast-track courts.
Impact:
Legislative response: Proposals for a special law on honour crimes.
Reinforced victim protection and prevention of caste-based and gender-based violence.
6. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996)
Facts: The accused assisted in the suicide of a person suffering from illness.
Issue: Whether the right to die is part of Article 21.
Judgment:
The Court held that right to life does not include the right to die.
Upheld the constitutionality of Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide).
Impact:
Influenced later discussions on euthanasia and end-of-life care.
Reflected the judiciary’s cautious approach to expanding criminal liability.
7. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Though not a criminal case per se, this judgment:
Expanded the interpretation of Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty).
Held that procedure established by law must be just, fair, and reasonable.
Impact:
Transformed the way criminal procedure laws were interpreted.
Later reforms in arrest laws, bail procedures, and fair trial standards have roots in this decision.
Conclusion
Legislative reforms in Indian criminal law are often a response to:
Judicial interpretations and activism (e.g., Vishaka, Joseph Shine),
Public outrage and activism (e.g., Nirbhaya case),
Changing societal norms (e.g., Navtej Singh Johar, Gian Kaur),
International obligations and human rights norms.
These reforms reflect the evolving nature of criminal law in balancing state interest, individual liberty, victim protection, and fair trial rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments