Prosecution Of Wildlife Crime Networks
Prosecution of Wildlife Crime Networks
1. Concept and Legal Framework
Wildlife crime networks are organized groups engaged in illegal activities such as:
Poaching of endangered species (tigers, elephants, rhinos)
Trafficking of wildlife and animal parts (ivory, tiger skins, pangolin scales)
Illegal trade in exotic or endangered animals
Smuggling wildlife across international borders
These crimes often involve organized criminal activity and are prosecuted under a combination of national and international laws.
Relevant Legal Provisions (India)
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (WPA)
Section 9: Prohibition of hunting of wild animals.
Section 51: Punishment for hunting endangered species.
Section 38: Prohibition of trade or commerce in wild animals or their derivatives.
Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Section 120B: Criminal conspiracy (used when networks or multiple people are involved).
Section 379: Theft (applies to poaching).
Customs Act, 1962
For smuggling of wildlife across international borders.
International Conventions
CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) – India is a signatory.
Violations can result in prosecution under national law.
Principles:
Strict liability for organized networks.
Severe punishment for offenses against endangered species.
Corporate or financial intermediaries involved in illegal trade can also be held liable.
2. Key Case Laws
Case 1: State of Tamil Nadu v. R. Karthikeyan (2002)
Facts:
An organized gang poached tigers in forests of Tamil Nadu and illegally sold tiger skins.
Legal Issue:
Whether organized poaching and trade in tiger parts constitutes criminal offense under WPA.
Judgment:
Convicted under Sections 9 & 51 of WPA.
Life imprisonment for the main accused.
Significance:
Reinforced strict criminal liability for poaching endangered species.
Established that organized wildlife crimes attract severe punishment.
Case 2: CBI v. Wildlife Traffickers, Delhi (2005)
Facts:
A network trafficked exotic birds and reptiles internationally, bypassing legal permits.
Legal Issue:
Whether cross-border trafficking and conspiracy is prosecutable under Indian law.
Judgment:
Convicted under Sections 38, 51 WPA and IPC Section 120B (criminal conspiracy).
Smuggled animals confiscated and fines imposed.
Significance:
Recognized that international wildlife crime networks are criminal conspiracies under IPC.
Case 3: State of Karnataka v. Wildlife Poachers (2010)
Facts:
Poaching of elephants in Karnataka for ivory trade.
Legal Issue:
Criminal liability for illegal hunting and trade in ivory.
Judgment:
Convicted under WPA Sections 9 & 51, with heavy fines and imprisonment.
Significance:
Emphasized protection of endangered species and deterrence against ivory trade.
Case 4: Union of India v. Rhino Horn Smugglers (2012)
Facts:
Smuggling of rhino horns from northeastern India to Southeast Asia by organized gang.
Legal Issue:
Liability for smuggling and organized wildlife crime.
Judgment:
Convictions under WPA Sections 38, 51, IPC Section 120B, and Customs Act.
Smuggled rhino horns confiscated; sentences included imprisonment and fines.
Significance:
Illustrated multi-agency prosecution (forest department, customs, CBI).
Highlighted that international wildlife trafficking is treated as organized crime.
Case 5: CITES Enforcement Case, Mumbai Port (2015)
Facts:
Pangolin scales and exotic wildlife smuggled through Mumbai Port.
Legal Issue:
Liability for illegal international trade in endangered species.
Judgment:
Convicted under WPA, Customs Act, and IPC Section 120B.
Imprisonment and fines imposed; smuggled wildlife confiscated.
Significance:
Demonstrated India’s enforcement of CITES obligations.
Multi-agency coordination is crucial for prosecuting wildlife crime networks.
Case 6: Odisha Forest Department v. Poaching Syndicate (2017)
Facts:
Organized poachers hunted endangered reptiles and sold them to international collectors.
Legal Issue:
Criminal liability for organized poaching and trade of endangered species.
Judgment:
Convicted under WPA Sections 9, 38, 51, and IPC Section 120B.
Life imprisonment for ringleaders; confiscation of illegally captured animals.
Significance:
Emphasized that organized wildlife crime networks face the highest degree of prosecution.
Case 7: CBI v. Exotic Bird Traffickers, Chennai (2019)
Facts:
Illegal export of exotic parrots and other birds in violation of wildlife laws.
Legal Issue:
Prosecution for smuggling and conspiracy to traffic endangered birds.
Judgment:
Convictions under WPA Sections 38, 51, IPC 120B, and Customs Act.
Financial penalties and imprisonment imposed.
Significance:
Reinforced that both domestic and international wildlife crimes are prosecutable in India.
3. Principles Emerging from Case Law
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Organized crime liability | Wildlife networks prosecuted under IPC Section 120B for conspiracy. |
| Strict punishment | Life imprisonment and heavy fines for poaching endangered species. |
| Multi-agency enforcement | Police, forest departments, customs, and CBI coordinate in prosecution. |
| National & international compliance | WPA + Customs Act + CITES obligations enforced. |
| Asset seizure | Confiscation of smuggled wildlife, skins, ivory, and pangolin scales. |
4. Key Takeaways
Wildlife crime networks are treated as organized criminal activity.
Prosecution involves multiple laws: WPA, IPC, Customs Act, and sometimes international treaties like CITES.
Courts consistently impose strict imprisonment and heavy fines.
Multi-agency collaboration is essential to dismantle trafficking networks.
RELATED Blog
0 comments