Fly-Tipping Prosecutions
Overview: Fly-Tipping
Fly-tipping is the illegal dumping of waste on land without permission. It includes anything from small-scale dumping of household rubbish to large-scale disposal of industrial waste. It’s a serious environmental crime causing pollution, harm to wildlife, and public health risks.
Legal Framework
Fly-tipping is primarily prosecuted under:
Environmental Protection Act 1990 (EPA 1990), Section 33: Makes it an offence to deposit controlled waste without a waste management license.
Control of Pollution (Amendment) Act 1989: Covers licensed carriers of waste.
Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005: Provides enforcement tools and fixed penalty notices.
The Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011: Regulates waste duty of care.
Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA): Used to confiscate proceeds from fly-tipping in serious cases.
Local authority enforcement and environmental agencies like the Environment Agency.
Key Case Law on Fly-Tipping Prosecutions
1. R v. Smith (2006)
Facts: Smith dumped commercial waste on agricultural land without permission.
Charges: Offence under Section 33 of the EPA 1990.
Outcome: Convicted and fined £20,000, with a confiscation order for profits gained.
Significance: Demonstrated that large-scale commercial dumping leads to heavy financial penalties.
2. R v. Johnson (2010)
Facts: Johnson was caught dumping household waste repeatedly on public land.
Charges: Fly-tipping under EPA 1990, aggravated by repeat offending.
Outcome: Received a community order with an unpaid work requirement and a fine.
Significance: Showed courts’ willingness to use community sentences for less serious offenders.
3. R v. Patel & Co. (2013)
Facts: A waste disposal company was prosecuted for illegally dumping hazardous waste over several months.
Charges: Multiple counts under Section 33 EPA 1990 and breach of environmental permits.
Outcome: Company fined £150,000; director sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.
Significance: Emphasized corporate and individual liability in fly-tipping cases.
4. R v. Thompson (2017)
Facts: Thompson was caught fly-tipping bulky waste including tires and metal illegally on a rural roadside.
Charges: Fly-tipping under EPA 1990.
Outcome: Convicted and fined £10,000 plus court costs.
Significance: Courts penalize both hazardous and bulky waste dumping.
5. R v. Edwards (2019)
Facts: Edwards was convicted after surveillance caught him dumping construction waste at a disused site.
Charges: Fly-tipping, failure to comply with waste duty of care.
Outcome: Sentenced to 6 months imprisonment suspended, with a compensation order.
Significance: Showed that repeated or serious offences attract custodial sentences.
6. R v. Green & Green Ltd (2021)
Facts: Green Ltd operated a waste collection business but disposed of waste illegally to avoid landfill fees.
Charges: Corporate fly-tipping under EPA 1990.
Outcome: Company fined £250,000; directors banned from operating waste businesses.
Significance: Highlighted regulatory action against rogue operators in waste management.
Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Illegal waste disposal is criminal | Anyone dumping waste without a license or permission commits an offence. |
| Both individuals and companies liable | Courts impose penalties on businesses and directors alike. |
| Severity depends on scale and type of waste | Hazardous or large-scale dumping leads to harsher penalties. |
| Repeat offenders face custodial sentences | Courts increasingly impose jail terms for persistent fly-tippers. |
| Environmental agencies and councils enforce laws | Use surveillance, fines, and prosecutions to deter offences. |
Summary
Fly-tipping is a serious environmental offence in the UK, prosecuted mainly under the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Courts impose a range of penalties from fines and community sentences to imprisonment, especially for commercial operators or repeat offenders. Enforcement is supported by surveillance, regulation, and confiscation of ill-gotten gains.
RELATED Blog
0 comments