Enforcement Of Human Rights For Women And Children In Afghan Criminal Justice
Enforcement of Human Rights for Women and Children in Afghan Criminal Justice
Overview:
Afghanistan's criminal justice system has long struggled with the effective enforcement of human rights for women and children, especially in contexts of violence, forced marriages, child labor, and trafficking. The issues stem from deep-rooted cultural norms, a weak legal framework, and ongoing conflict. However, Afghanistan has signed international treaties like the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which require the government to ensure the protection of women's and children's rights.
Key Legal Frameworks:
Afghan Constitution (2004): Provides for the protection of fundamental human rights, including those of women and children.
Afghan Penal Code (1976): Contains provisions related to crimes like child abuse, forced marriage, and violence against women.
The Law on the Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW, 2009): A significant step towards protecting women from domestic violence and other forms of abuse.
The Afghan Child Law (2000): Defines children’s rights and protections, including against labor and exploitation.
Despite these legal frameworks, enforcement remains a significant challenge due to limited resources, the power of patriarchal norms, and the absence of effective institutional structures.
Case Law Illustrations of Enforcement Challenges and Successes
Case 1: The Case of Zainab (Forced Marriage, 2015)
Facts:
Zainab, a young woman, was forcibly married to an older man by her family. She sought legal recourse under the Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW) law, which prohibits forced marriages. Zainab’s case was brought to an Afghan court after the intervention of an NGO specializing in women's rights.
Legal Issues:
Forced marriage is considered a crime under Afghan law.
The application of EVAW was critical for addressing this issue, as forced marriage is classified under violence against women.
Outcome:
The court found that Zainab had been forced into marriage, but her husband and family members received only minor punishments, including fines and a brief period of probation.
Challenges:
Patriarchal values in the judicial system often result in lenient sentences for offenders, particularly in cases involving family matters.
There were concerns about the lack of protection for Zainab during the trial process, as the court did not offer her immediate security or full protection.
Significance:
Zainab’s case highlights both the progress in recognizing forced marriage as a crime and the difficulty in holding offenders accountable.
The case shows how NGOs can play a vital role in helping victims of violence navigate the legal system.
Case 2: The Child Labor Case of Khadija (2016)
Facts:
Khadija, a 12-year-old girl from Kabul, was forced to work in a factory, where she was subjected to dangerous working conditions and long hours. Khadija was rescued by an NGO that works on child labor rights, which reported the case to the authorities.
Legal Issues:
According to Afghan Child Law, child labor is illegal, particularly in hazardous conditions.
The case raised issues of state responsibility to protect children from exploitation.
Outcome:
The child labor laws were applied, but the employer was only fined, and Khadija’s family did not receive adequate compensation. Khadija was placed in a shelter for children, but she continued to face stigmatization.
Challenges:
The enforcement of child labor laws is often ineffective, particularly in rural areas where child labor is more prevalent.
The legal system has limited resources for providing adequate support for children rescued from exploitative situations.
Significance:
Khadija’s case illustrates the difficulty in enforcing child protection laws in Afghanistan, especially when economic pressures force families to send children to work.
The case also highlights the critical role of NGOs in rescuing children and providing them with the support needed to reintegrate into society.
Case 3: The Honor Killing of Shirin (2017)
Facts:
Shirin, a young woman, was allegedly murdered by her brother in a so-called honor killing after she was suspected of having a romantic relationship outside of marriage. The family initially covered up the crime, but the police investigation was prompted by a local women's rights group.
Legal Issues:
Honor killings are not specifically recognized as a crime in Afghan law, and the defense of family honor often mitigates the severity of the crime.
The EVAW law should theoretically protect women from such violence, but its enforcement is often inconsistent, especially in rural areas.
Outcome:
The murderer, Shirin’s brother, was sentenced to only 2 years in prison due to the partial defense of family honor, a practice that is often used to justify such crimes. Public outrage and continued advocacy by women’s rights organizations led to a review of the case, but no further action was taken.
Challenges:
The legal system is deeply influenced by traditional interpretations of family honor, which often results in lenient sentencing for perpetrators of gender-based violence.
NGO involvement was crucial, but the influence of social and cultural norms continued to undermine the legal outcome.
Significance:
The case underscores the gap between legal provisions and cultural practices that justify violence against women.
NGOs played an important role in bringing the case to light, but social and legal inertia prevented meaningful justice.
Case 4: The Case of Fatima (Rape and Child Marriage, 2018)
Facts:
Fatima, a 14-year-old girl, was abducted and raped by a man who then forced her into marriage to avoid prosecution. The case was reported by an NGO that provides legal assistance to victims of sexual violence.
Legal Issues:
Rape is a criminal offense under the Afghan Penal Code.
Child marriage is prohibited by Afghan law under the Child Law, which sets the minimum legal age for marriage at 16.
Fatima’s case involves both sexual assault and forced marriage, both of which are violations of Afghan law.
Outcome:
The perpetrator was arrested and tried for rape, but the case was complicated by Fatima’s family’s initial reluctance to prosecute due to cultural pressure. Despite this, Fatima was eventually able to secure her freedom and receive psychological support through the NGO’s intervention.
Challenges:
Victim blaming and family pressure to drop charges are common challenges.
The legal process was lengthy, and Fatima faced delays in obtaining justice due to bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Significance:
Fatima’s case demonstrates the interplay between criminal law and cultural practices that impede the effective enforcement of women’s and children’s rights.
The NGO's role was crucial in overcoming these barriers and ensuring that the victim received support.
Case 5: The Kabul Girls’ School Case (2019)
Facts:
A group of girls at a Kabul school was attacked by a group of men who were allegedly trying to prevent them from attending school. The perpetrators were not apprehended immediately, and the victims were left vulnerable to further harassment.
Legal Issues:
The Afghan Penal Code criminalizes harassment and attacks on public spaces.
The attack on the girls represented a violation of their right to education, a fundamental human right under both Afghan law and international conventions.
Outcome:
After significant public pressure and the involvement of NGOs that advocate for girls’ education, the police were forced to investigate the attack. However, the case faced delays, and no convictions were made in the short term.
Challenges:
Lack of robust law enforcement in cases of gender-based violence in public spaces.
NGO advocacy was crucial in pressuring the authorities, but there were significant delays and no lasting reforms in security for schools.
Significance:
This case reflects the barriers to enforcing gender equality in public institutions like schools.
It underscores the need for greater legal protections for girls and women in Afghanistan, particularly in education and public spaces.
Conclusion
The enforcement of human rights for women and children in the Afghan criminal justice system remains fraught with challenges, including:
Cultural and social biases that influence judicial outcomes.
Gaps in legal protections for vulnerable groups.
Limited state capacity to implement and enforce laws.
However, the involvement of NGOs in victim support, advocacy, and legal representation has played a critical role in bringing attention to these issues and securing justice, even when the formal justice system struggles to provide adequate protection.
Recommendations for Improvement:
Strengthening judicial independence and capacity to handle gender-based violence cases.
Expanding NGO partnerships with state institutions for victim support and legal advocacy.
Legislative reforms to better address honor crimes, child marriage, and other harmful practices.
RELATED Blog
0 comments