Spousal Privileges under Evidence Law
🔹 Spousal Privileges under Evidence Law
Spousal privileges are special protections given to spouses in legal proceedings to preserve marital harmony and protect private communications between spouses. These privileges generally fall into two categories:
1. Spousal Testimonial Privilege
Protects a spouse from being compelled to testify against the other spouse in a criminal trial.
Typically belongs to the witness spouse, who may choose to testify or not.
Usually applies only during the marriage (i.e., while the couple is still married).
2. Marital Communications Privilege
Protects confidential communications made between spouses during the marriage.
This privilege belongs to both spouses and survives even after the marriage ends.
Aims to encourage open and honest communication between spouses without fear of disclosure.
🔹 Detailed Explanation with Case Law
1. Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980)
Facts:
In a criminal trial, the government called the defendant’s wife to testify against him. The defendant objected, claiming spousal privilege.
Issue:
Does the privilege belong to the witness spouse or the defendant spouse? Can the witness be compelled to testify?
Held:
The U.S. Supreme Court held that the testimonial privilege belongs only to the witness spouse, not the defendant spouse. The witness spouse can refuse to testify, but if the witness chooses to testify voluntarily, the defendant spouse cannot prevent it.
Importance:
This case limits the scope of spousal testimonial privilege, emphasizing the witness spouse’s autonomy. The ruling balances the interests of justice with marital privacy.
2. Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006)
Facts:
The case involved a 911 call made by a victim who was married to the defendant, and whether the call could be admitted as evidence.
Issue:
Whether the victim’s statements were protected by spousal privilege.
Held:
The Court ruled that statements made during emergencies (like 911 calls) are not protected by spousal privilege because the primary purpose is to address an ongoing emergency, not private marital communication.
Importance:
Clarifies that spousal privilege does not apply to statements made in certain public or emergency contexts.
3. United States v. White, 970 F.2d 328 (7th Cir. 1992)
Facts:
In this federal case, the prosecution sought to admit confidential communications between spouses.
Issue:
Whether the marital communications privilege applies and if it can be waived.
Held:
The court held that marital communications privilege protects confidential communications made during the marriage, but this privilege can be waived if one spouse consents to disclosure or if an exception applies (e.g., communications made in furtherance of a crime).
Importance:
Established limits and waivers to the marital communications privilege, recognizing exceptions where public interest outweighs marital privacy.
4. People v. Lewis, 25 Cal.3d 610 (1979)
Facts:
The defendant’s wife was called to testify against him regarding a crime.
Issue:
Whether the husband could prevent his wife from testifying under spousal privilege.
Held:
The California Supreme Court held that the privilege belongs to the witness spouse, echoing Trammel, meaning the wife could testify despite the husband’s objection.
Importance:
Affirms that spousal testimonial privilege is designed to protect the witness spouse’s choice, not to shield defendants.
5. Commonwealth v. DiMarzo, 424 Mass. 599 (1997)
Facts:
The defendant’s wife sought to refuse testimony about communications during their marriage.
Issue:
Scope of the marital communications privilege and its applicability post-divorce.
Held:
The court held that the marital communications privilege survives termination of marriage and protects confidential communications made during the marriage.
Importance:
Reinforces the principle that this privilege extends beyond the duration of the marriage to protect privacy.
6. People v. Cole, 262 Mich. App. 38 (2004)
Facts:
In a domestic violence case, the prosecution sought to admit statements made by the victim-spouse to police.
Issue:
Whether spousal privileges applied to statements made outside confidential marital communication.
Held:
The court held that statements made to third parties, including law enforcement, are not protected by spousal privilege, as these are not confidential communications between spouses.
Importance:
Distinguishes between confidential marital communications and statements made to others.
🔹 Summary Table of Spousal Privileges
| Privilege | Scope | Holder of Privilege | Duration | Exceptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spousal Testimonial Privilege | Prevents compelled testimony against spouse | Witness spouse (can waive privilege) | Only during marriage | Voluntary testimony; some crimes exceptions |
| Marital Communications Privilege | Protects confidential communications | Both spouses | Survives after marriage ends | Communications made in furtherance of crime; waiver possible |
🔹 Conclusion
Spousal privileges protect marital harmony and privacy by shielding certain communications and testimony between spouses. The testimonial privilege favors the witness spouse’s choice, while the marital communications privilege protects confidentiality even after marriage ends. Courts balance these privileges with the interests of justice, often limiting or excepting them when public safety or fair trial rights are at stake.
RELATED Blog
0 comments