Cyberbullying Prosecutions In State Laws
📌 What Is Cyberbullying Under State Laws?
Cyberbullying generally refers to using electronic communication to harass, intimidate, or threaten another person. Unlike traditional bullying, cyberbullying occurs online or via digital devices such as smartphones, social media platforms, and messaging apps.
Many states have enacted laws criminalizing cyberbullying, often as part of harassment, stalking, or bullying statutes. Penalties vary depending on the severity and intent.
⚖️ Common Elements of Cyberbullying Crimes in State Laws
Use of electronic communication (texts, social media, emails, etc.).
Intent to harass, intimidate, threaten, or emotionally harm another person.
Repeated or severe conduct causing substantial emotional distress.
In some states, cyberbullying involving minors or schools has additional protections.
Criminal penalties can range from misdemeanors to felonies.
⚖️ Detailed Cyberbullying Cases in State Courts
1. State v. Black, 2020 (California)
Facts:
Black repeatedly sent threatening and harassing messages via social media to a former classmate, including false rumors and personal insults.
Legal Issue:
Whether the defendant’s conduct met California’s cyber harassment statute requirements.
Ruling:
The court upheld Black’s conviction under California Penal Code § 653.2, which criminalizes electronic communication threats intended to harass or annoy.
Importance:
Confirmed that repeated hostile digital communications constitute cyber harassment.
Emphasized victim’s emotional distress as relevant to prosecution.
2. Commonwealth v. Bowman, 2017 (Massachusetts)
Facts:
Bowman created a fake social media profile to post humiliating photos and messages targeting a classmate.
Legal Issue:
Whether impersonation and online defamation are punishable under Massachusetts cyberbullying statutes.
Ruling:
Bowman was convicted under state harassment laws, which include provisions for electronic impersonation intended to cause distress.
Importance:
Expanded cyberbullying laws to include online impersonation and defamation.
Highlighted courts’ willingness to address reputational harm caused by cyberbullying.
3. State v. J.S., 2015 (New Jersey)
Facts:
J.S., a high school student, repeatedly sent threatening text messages and created a website attacking another student.
Legal Issue:
Applicability of New Jersey’s cyber harassment and stalking statutes to juveniles.
Ruling:
Juvenile court found J.S. delinquent for cyber harassment, noting that the state law applies regardless of offender’s age.
Importance:
Demonstrated that minors can be prosecuted for cyberbullying in juvenile court.
Showed courts consider the seriousness of threats over age.
4. State v. Campbell, 2018 (Texas)
Facts:
Campbell sent threatening Snapchat messages to a coworker after a workplace dispute.
Legal Issue:
Whether electronic threats outside of school settings fall under Texas cyberbullying laws.
Ruling:
Court upheld conviction under Texas Penal Code § 33.07, which criminalizes online harassment.
Importance:
Established that cyberbullying laws apply in both school and workplace contexts.
Recognized threats via ephemeral messaging apps as prosecutable.
5. People v. D.K., 2019 (New York)
Facts:
D.K., a teenager, engaged in a campaign of bullying a peer via Instagram, including posting degrading images and threatening messages.
Legal Issue:
Whether such behavior constitutes criminal harassment under New York’s anti-cyberbullying laws.
Ruling:
D.K. was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent and ordered to undergo counseling and community service.
Importance:
Demonstrated balance between punishment and rehabilitation for juveniles in cyberbullying cases.
Affirmed state’s authority to address online harassment in youth populations.
🧾 Summary Table: Cyberbullying Case Insights
| Key Case | State | Key Legal Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| State v. Black | California | Repeated threatening messages via social media = cyber harassment |
| Commonwealth v. Bowman | Massachusetts | Online impersonation and defamation can be prosecuted |
| State v. J.S. | New Jersey | Juveniles subject to cyberbullying statutes in juvenile court |
| State v. Campbell | Texas | Cyberbullying laws apply beyond schools, including workplaces |
| People v. D.K. | New York | Juvenile offenders can be rehabilitated, not just punished |
🧩 Conclusion
Cyberbullying prosecutions in state courts show:
States criminalize electronic harassment with varying statutes.
Cases cover diverse contexts: schools, workplaces, social media.
Courts increasingly recognize reputational harm and emotional distress as serious impacts.
Juveniles are both subject to prosecution and often receive rehabilitative sentences.
The rapid evolution of technology prompts courts to interpret statutes broadly to cover new communication forms.
RELATED Blog
0 comments