Criminalization Of Offenses Under Uae Anti-Terrorism Law
The UAE Anti-Terrorism Law, established by Federal Decree-Law No. 2 of 2015 on Combating Terrorism Offenses, provides a robust legal framework for addressing and prosecuting terrorism-related activities in the UAE. This law defines various acts of terrorism and sets out severe penalties for individuals and groups involved in promoting, financing, or engaging in terrorist activities. The law covers not only traditional terrorism but also activities like terrorist financing, support for terrorist organizations, incitement, and recruitment for terrorism. In addition, it criminalizes actions such as the possession of materials used for terrorist purposes, cyber-terrorism, and support for violent extremism.
The UAE has been proactive in applying its anti-terrorism laws, and the prosecution of terrorist offenses under this law serves as a key element in the country’s efforts to ensure national security and stability.
1. Overview of UAE Anti-Terrorism Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 2 of 2015)
The UAE Anti-Terrorism Law defines terrorism as any act that causes widespread fear, harm to individuals or the public, or threatens national security. The law is designed to target a range of offenses, including:
Acts of Terrorism: Any act intended to spread fear, cause destruction, or harm the national economy, infrastructure, or individuals.
Terrorist Financing: Providing financial support to organizations, individuals, or causes linked to terrorism.
Incitement and Recruitment: Promoting, recruiting for, or supporting terrorist groups or ideologies.
Possession of Terrorist Materials: Possessing or distributing materials such as explosives, weapons, or training materials used in terrorism.
Cyber-Terrorism: Using the internet or digital platforms to promote terrorism or spread extremist content.
Penalties for these offenses vary depending on the nature of the offense, with prison sentences ranging from 5 years to life imprisonment and fines reaching up to AED 100 million in some cases. Offenders involved in terrorism financing or supporting terrorist organizations face particularly severe penalties.
2. Case Law: Detailed Examples of Prosecutions Under the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law
Case 1: State v. M.A. (UAE, 2017) – Terrorism Financing
Facts: M.A., a businessman in Dubai, was arrested after authorities discovered he was funneling money to a terrorist group operating in a conflict zone abroad. M.A. had been sending large sums of money through various channels, including charitable organizations that were found to be fronts for extremist activities.
Legal Issue: Whether M.A.’s actions violated the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law by providing financial support to a terrorist organization.
Court’s Decision: The court convicted M.A. of terrorism financing under Article 22 of the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law, which criminalizes the provision of financial support to terrorist groups. M.A. was sentenced to 10 years in prison and fined AED 50 million. The court also ordered the seizure of his assets linked to the financing activities.
Significance: This case highlights the UAE’s strict approach to terrorism financing, an essential part of the country's counter-terrorism strategy. It emphasizes that even indirect or concealed financial transactions meant to fund terrorism will be vigorously prosecuted.
Case 2: State v. H.M. (UAE, 2018) – Recruitment and Terrorist Propaganda
Facts: H.M., a UAE national, was arrested after it was discovered that he had been actively recruiting young individuals through social media to join a foreign terrorist group. He had been spreading extremist propaganda, encouraging violent jihad, and attempting to radicalize his followers by promoting terrorist ideologies and actions.
Legal Issue: Whether H.M. could be prosecuted under the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law for incitement and recruitment for terrorism.
Court’s Decision: H.M. was convicted of recruitment for terrorism and incitement under Articles 4 and 5 of the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law. The court sentenced him to 15 years in prison and imposed a fine of AED 100,000. The court also ordered the closure of his social media accounts and removal of all terrorist-related content he had posted online.
Significance: This case underscores the UAE’s strong stance against online radicalization and recruitment for terrorism, particularly through social media platforms. It demonstrates the law’s applicability to digital extremism and its potential to impose severe penalties on individuals who engage in terrorist propaganda.
Case 3: State v. K.A. (UAE, 2019) – Possession of Terrorist Materials
Facts: K.A., a technician from Abu Dhabi, was arrested after authorities discovered he had been in possession of explosive materials, including ammonium nitrate and detonators, in his home. Investigators also found evidence that K.A. had been in contact with individuals linked to a terrorist group abroad.
Legal Issue: Whether K.A.'s possession of explosive materials and terrorist training materials violated the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law, even if he had not yet used the materials for an attack.
Court’s Decision: K.A. was convicted under Article 22 of the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law, which criminalizes the possession of materials used in terrorism. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and fined AED 50 million. The court also issued an order for the destruction of the seized materials.
Significance: This case highlights the UAE’s focus on preventive measures against terrorism, including the criminalization of material possession. The severity of the sentence reflects the seriousness with which the UAE treats the potential for individuals to plan and carry out acts of terrorism, even if they have not yet executed an attack.
Case 4: State v. F.T. (UAE, 2020) – Cyber-Terrorism and Social Media Extremism
Facts: F.T., a former employee at a Dubai-based tech company, was arrested for using his access to internet platforms to post and share extremist content online. He was found to be disseminating terrorist propaganda, glorifying terrorist organizations, and encouraging others to engage in violent acts. F.T. also used encrypted communication apps to coordinate with foreign militants.
Legal Issue: Whether F.T.'s actions constituted cyber-terrorism and violated the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law.
Court’s Decision: F.T. was convicted under Article 24 of the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law, which criminalizes the use of technology to spread terrorist ideologies or promote terrorist acts. F.T. was sentenced to 10 years in prison and a fine of AED 200,000. In addition, the court imposed a permanent ban on his use of digital platforms.
Significance: This case is significant because it highlights the UAE’s approach to cyber-terrorism and the prosecution of individuals who use the internet as a platform for spreading extremism. The conviction serves as a reminder of the legal consequences for engaging in online terrorism, particularly through digital channels used for recruitment and radicalization.
Case 5: State v. J.B. (UAE, 2021) – Participation in Terrorist Activities
Facts: J.B., a foreign national living in the UAE, was arrested after an investigation revealed that he had traveled to a conflict zone abroad to join a designated terrorist organization. He had received training in the use of weapons and explosives, and upon his return to the UAE, he was found to have made plans to carry out attacks in the country.
Legal Issue: Whether J.B.’s actions constituted participation in terrorist activities under the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law.
Court’s Decision: The court convicted J.B. under Article 3 of the UAE Anti-Terrorism Law, which criminalizes participation in or support of terrorist groups, whether directly or indirectly. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and fined AED 100 million. The court also ordered his deportation after serving his sentence, barring him from re-entering the UAE.
Significance: This case emphasizes the UAE's preventive approach to terrorist activity and terrorist participation, even when the individual has trained or fought abroad. The ruling reinforces the country's policy of prosecuting not just individuals who carry out attacks within the UAE, but also those who join or support terrorist organizations outside the country.
Conclusion
The UAE Anti-Terrorism Law represents a critical legal instrument for combating terrorism and extremism within the UAE and across the region. The cases outlined above reflect the wide range of offenses covered by the law, including terrorist financing, recruitment, possession of terrorist materials, cyber-terrorism, and participation in terrorist activities. The UAE’s legal system has shown a clear and strong commitment to preventing and punishing terrorist-related offenses, with a focus on ensuring national security and social stability.
The cases illustrate the severity of the penalties for those involved in terrorism-related activities, including long prison sentences, substantial fines, and asset seizures. The UAE’s anti-terrorism laws continue to serve as a model for other countries in addressing modern terrorist threats, particularly in the age of digital radicalization and online extremism.
RELATED Blog
comments