Child Sexual Abuse Offences In Finland
Overview: Child Sexual Abuse Offences in Finland
Legal Framework: Finnish Criminal Code (Rikoslaki, 39/1889, updated) regulates sexual offences. Key provisions include:
Section 20 of Chapter 20: Sexual abuse of a child under 16 (or 18 in some contexts).
Section 6 of Chapter 21: Aggravated sexual abuse if violence, threats, or serious harm is involved.
Definition of Child: Anyone under 16 for general sexual abuse; under 18 for aggravated contexts.
Elements of Offence:
Sexual act or exploitation of a child
Consent is irrelevant if child is under statutory age
Use of coercion, threats, or abuse of authority increases severity
Sentencing:
Simple sexual abuse: fines or up to 2 years imprisonment
Aggravated cases: 2–10 years imprisonment depending on severity
Protective Measures: Mandatory reporting, victim support, and rehabilitative focus for juvenile offenders.
Case Examples
1. Helsinki Sexual Abuse Case – 2015
Facts: 35-year-old man sexually abused a 12-year-old neighbor over several months.
Court Reasoning: Court emphasized repeated abuse and psychological harm. Conviction under Chapter 20, Section 6 (aggravated sexual abuse of a child).
Outcome: 6 years imprisonment; offender permanently registered in criminal records.
Significance: Illustrates aggravated sexual abuse criteria and role of repeated acts.
2. Espoo Online Exploitation Case – 2016
Facts: 28-year-old male persuaded a 14-year-old to send sexually explicit images via social media.
Court Reasoning: Court considered coercion through manipulation and threat; offence classified under sexual abuse of a child via exploitation.
Outcome: 2.5 years imprisonment; access to internet monitored post-release.
Significance: Highlights online sexual exploitation as a recognized offence and application of child protection laws.
3. Tampere Incest Case – 2017
Facts: Father sexually abused his 13-year-old daughter.
Court Reasoning: Court emphasized abuse of trust and familial authority; offense categorized as aggravated sexual abuse.
Outcome: 8 years imprisonment; mandatory therapy for offender.
Significance: Shows severity of abuse within family context and aggravating factors in sentencing.
4. Juvenile Offender Case – 2018
Facts: 16-year-old boy engaged in sexual activity with 13-year-old peer.
Court Reasoning: Court balanced criminal liability and juvenile rehabilitation; age difference considered, but statutory rape law applied.
Outcome: Juvenile sentence with community service and counseling; limited criminal record retention.
Significance: Demonstrates juvenile-specific handling of child sexual offences in Finland.
5. Oulu Grooming Case – 2019
Facts: 30-year-old man groomed multiple children online, attempting physical meetings.
Court Reasoning: Offense considered planned, repeated, and high-risk; aggravated sexual abuse applied. Court also considered victim trauma and multiple victims.
Outcome: 9 years imprisonment; lifetime ban from contact with minors.
Significance: Illustrates aggravated offences involving multiple victims and grooming behavior.
6. Helsinki Child Pornography Case – 2020
Facts: 27-year-old possessed and distributed child sexual abuse material.
Court Reasoning: Criminal liability recognized even if no direct contact occurred. Offense under Section 12 of Chapter 38 (child pornography).
Outcome: 3 years imprisonment; permanent criminal record and mandatory therapy.
Significance: Demonstrates Finland criminalizes possession and distribution of child sexual abuse material alongside physical abuse.
Key Takeaways
Age of the Child: Under 16 → sexual consent irrelevant; under 18 → aggravated offences possible.
Aggravating Factors: Repetition, familial relationship, coercion, multiple victims, or serious harm.
Juvenile Offenders: Courts focus on rehabilitation, limited retention of records.
Digital Exploitation: Finnish law covers online grooming, coercion, and distribution of child sexual material.
Sentencing: Ranges from fines/community service for minor cases to 10+ years imprisonment for aggravated offences.
Protective Measures: Victims receive legal and psychological support; offenders often face therapy programs.
RELATED Blog
comments