Witness Protection Under Finnish Law
Legal Framework in Finland
Witness Protection Act (Laki todistajien suojelusta 1053/2016):
Provides legal measures to protect witnesses whose safety is at risk due to criminal proceedings.
Protection measures include anonymity, relocation, identity change, and police protection.
Criminal Procedure Code (Rikoslaki & Oikeudenkäymiskaari):
Courts can order special protection measures during testimony, such as closed hearings, screens, or voice distortion.
Purpose:
Ensure witnesses can testify safely without fear of retaliation.
Maintain the integrity of criminal proceedings, particularly for organized crime, corruption, and violent offenses.
1. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2008:58
Facts: A key witness in an organized crime trial requested anonymity due to threats from the accused.
Court Findings:
Court allowed witness to testify behind a screen and have voice distortion.
Emphasized balancing defendant’s right to a fair trial with witness safety.
Significance:
Established that physical protection measures and anonymity are permissible if necessary for safety.
Reinforced principle of proportionality in protective measures.
2. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2012:34
Facts: A witness in a drug trafficking case received threats from criminal associates.
Court Findings:
Police were authorized to relocate the witness temporarily and provide identity protection.
Court stressed that threat to life or severe harm justifies proactive protective measures.
Significance:
Demonstrated active law enforcement involvement in witness protection.
Highlighted that protective measures can include relocation and law enforcement monitoring.
3. District Court of Helsinki, 2015
Facts: Witness in a corporate corruption case feared retaliation from the accused executives.
Court Findings:
Witness allowed to submit written statements instead of oral testimony in court.
Court ensured the accused had access to evidence to maintain procedural fairness.
Significance:
Introduced flexibility in Finnish courts: written or remote testimony is permissible for vulnerable witnesses.
Protection measures must balance witness safety with defendant’s right to confront evidence.
4. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2017:46
Facts: A minor witness in a sexual abuse case faced intimidation from the accused’s family.
Court Findings:
Court allowed the child to testify via video link from a protected location.
Court emphasized minimizing psychological harm to the witness.
Significance:
Showed that Finnish law prioritizes child witnesses’ safety and well-being.
Flexible procedural tools, including video testimony, are legally supported.
5. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO 2018:12
Facts: Witness in a high-profile organized crime trial received repeated anonymous threats.
Court Findings:
Court approved police surveillance, relocation, and temporary identity protection.
Court also noted that the accused may receive limited cross-examination rights to ensure fair trial.
Significance:
Reinforced that comprehensive protection measures can be implemented for high-risk witnesses.
Witness protection measures can include long-term relocation and monitoring.
6. District Court of Turku, 2020
Facts: Witness in a domestic violence case refused in-person testimony due to fear of the accused.
Court Findings:
Court allowed testimony via secure video link and restricted disclosure of personal information.
Significance:
Highlights procedural flexibility in Finnish courts to encourage participation of reluctant witnesses.
Protects both witness safety and integrity of testimony.
Key Principles from Finnish Case Law
Safety First: Witness protection is triggered by credible threats of violence, intimidation, or retaliation.
Flexible Measures: Courts may employ anonymity, screens, voice distortion, video links, relocation, and identity changes.
Proportionality: Protection must balance defendant’s fair trial rights with witness safety.
Active Police Role: Law enforcement can provide security, relocation, and surveillance.
Special Considerations for Vulnerable Witnesses: Minors and witnesses in organized crime cases receive heightened protections.
RELATED Blog
comments