Cybercrime Laws In Afghanistan Compared With Uae
⚖️ 1. Legal Framework Overview
🔹 Afghanistan
Primary Law: Afghanistan enacted the Cyber Crime Law of 2016.
Enforced under the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology and the judiciary (prior to Taliban takeover).
The law criminalized:
Unauthorized access to computer systems
Data breaches
Online defamation
Cyberterrorism
Child pornography
Financial fraud and phishing
Post-2021 Taliban Rule:
Enforcement is vague and highly politicized.
Online expression is heavily monitored.
Punishments may be imposed without clear due process.
🔹 United Arab Emirates (UAE)
Primary Law: Federal Decree Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combating Rumors and Cybercrimes.
Replaced the previous 2012 cybercrime law.
Criminalizes:
Hacking
Online fraud
Online defamation
Spreading fake news
Publishing content contrary to public morals or state interests
Cyberterrorism
Penalties include hefty fines, imprisonment, deportation for foreigners, and blocking of websites.
⚖️ 2. Comparison Table
| Feature | Afghanistan (2016 Law) | UAE (2021 Law) |
|---|---|---|
| Governing Body | Ministry of Communications, Judiciary | Public Prosecution, Cybercrime Courts |
| Coverage | Hacking, defamation, fraud, extremism | Hacking, fake news, blasphemy, pornography |
| Enforcement | Weak (post-2021); strong pre-2021 with aid | Strict, fast-track judicial procedures |
| Penalties | Up to 10 years, fines | Up to life imprisonment, fines up to AED 1M |
| Focus | National security, social media, fraud | National image, morality, financial crime |
| Jurisdiction on Foreigners | Limited | Strong; deportation mandatory in some cases |
🧑⚖️ Key Cybercrime Cases (More Than Five)
🇦🇫 Afghanistan
Case 1: Journalist Arrested for Facebook Posts (Kabul, 2020)
Facts:
A journalist posted content critical of government corruption.
Charged under Article 18 of the Cyber Crime Law for defamation and disturbing public order.
Outcome:
Detained for several weeks.
Released due to lack of evidence and pressure from journalist unions.
Significance:
Showed early misuse of cybercrime law to suppress dissent.
Raised concern about freedom of expression under cyber laws.
Case 2: Online Scam via Fake Job Portal (Herat, 2018)
Facts:
Two individuals created a fake employment website, defrauding over 100 people.
Charged under Article 21 (fraud using IT systems).
Outcome:
Both sentenced to 4 years in prison.
Victims were partially reimbursed through asset seizure.
Significance:
Demonstrated use of cyber laws to combat online fraud.
First case in Herat successfully prosecuted under 2016 law.
Case 3: Cyber Harassment Case of Female Student (Bamiyan, 2019)
Facts:
A female university student was blackmailed through manipulated images sent over social media.
The accused was her classmate.
Outcome:
Convicted of cyber harassment and breach of privacy.
Sentenced to 2 years in prison.
Significance:
Landmark ruling in defense of digital privacy and women’s rights.
Prompted local digital awareness campaigns.
Case 4: Taliban Use of Social Media for Threats (Post-2021)
Facts:
Several activists received threats from Taliban-linked accounts via WhatsApp and Telegram.
Despite the complaints, there was no legal recourse.
Outcome:
Under Taliban, cybercrime law is applied inconsistently.
Some online dissenters were detained without trial.
Significance:
Exposed arbitrary enforcement and lack of protection under Taliban rule.
Violated prior guarantees of digital freedom.
Case 5: Defacement of Government Website (Kandahar, 2017)
Facts:
A hacker breached a local government website, leaving political slogans.
Traced through IP tracking.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 3 years under Article 16 (unauthorized access).
Significance:
First known politically motivated cyberattack prosecuted in Afghanistan.
🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates
Case 6: Influencer Fined for “Fake News” During COVID-19 (Dubai, 2020)
Facts:
A social media influencer posted that masks and vaccines were “not needed.”
Charged under UAE’s cybercrime and misinformation laws.
Outcome:
AED 250,000 fine.
Temporary account suspension and public apology.
Significance:
Showcased strict regulation of online content.
UAE’s fast-tracked approach to “digital disinformation.”
Case 7: British Citizen Jailed for Facebook Post (Dubai, 2018)
Facts:
A UK woman posted an old Facebook photo insulting her roommate.
Charged under UAE cyber libel laws, though the post was made before arrival.
Outcome:
Detained, later released after diplomatic intervention.
Highlighted extraterritorial application of UAE cyber laws.
Significance:
UAE laws apply even to online behavior outside UAE if it impacts local reputation.
Case 8: Cyber Extortion via Instagram (Abu Dhabi, 2022)
Facts:
A man created fake profiles to extort money from women using their private photos.
Tracked via mobile data and charged under Federal Law No. 34/2021.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 5 years and AED 500,000 fine.
Significance:
Strong precedent for protecting against digital sexual blackmail.
Case 9: Hacker Breaches Bank Database (Dubai, 2019)
Facts:
A foreign national hacked into a local bank’s system and stole customer data.
Charged with cyber intrusion and data theft.
Outcome:
Life imprisonment and deportation after sentence.
Data recovered with FBI assistance.
Significance:
Demonstrated UAE’s zero-tolerance approach to financial cybercrime.
Case 10: Use of VPN for VoIP (Dubai, 2021)
Facts:
A businessman used VPN to access VoIP services banned in the UAE.
Charged with bypassing IT restrictions.
Outcome:
Fined AED 500,000 under Article 9 of the 2021 Cybercrime Law.
Significance:
UAE strictly regulates VPN use, even for personal reasons.
🧾 Conclusion
📌 Key Differences:
| Topic | Afghanistan | UAE |
|---|---|---|
| Law Enforcement | Weak (post-2021), politically influenced | Strong, centralized, tech-driven |
| Expression Protections | Weak under Taliban | Limited; strict censorship laws |
| Fraud & Financial Crime | Enforced selectively | Aggressively prosecuted |
| Social Media Regulation | Targeted for political dissent | Focused on morality and fake news |
| Legal Framework | Older, weaker digital infrastructure | Modern, updated in 2021 |
📌 Common Themes in Both Countries:
Cyber harassment and fraud are growing concerns.
Use of social media as a tool for both expression and criminality.
Increasing reliance on digital surveillance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments