Data Breach And Theft Prosecutions
What is Data Breach and Theft?
Data breach refers to unauthorized access, acquisition, or disclosure of sensitive, confidential, or protected data.
Data theft specifically involves stealing data for malicious purposes, such as identity theft, espionage, or financial gain.
Prosecutions often involve federal laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) (18 U.S.C. § 1030), identity theft statutes, and other cybercrime laws.
Detailed Cases of Data Breach and Theft Prosecutions
1. United States v. Albert Gonzalez
Facts:
Albert Gonzalez led a massive hacking ring responsible for stealing over 170 million credit card numbers from major companies, including TJX and Heartland Payment Systems, between 2005 and 2007.
Legal Issues:
Gonzalez was charged under the CFAA, wire fraud, identity theft, and conspiracy for unauthorized access to protected computers and theft of payment card information.
Outcome:
In 2010, Gonzalez pled guilty and was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison—the longest sentence ever for hacking-related crimes at that time.
Significance:
This case is one of the largest data breach prosecutions and illustrates the severe penalties for large-scale cyber theft involving sensitive financial data.
2. United States v. Edward Snowden
Facts:
Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor, leaked classified government information related to surveillance programs. Though not a traditional data breach for financial gain, his unauthorized disclosure of classified data was prosecuted.
Legal Issues:
Snowden was charged with theft of government property and violations of the Espionage Act for unauthorized access and disclosure of classified data.
Outcome:
Snowden fled the U.S. and remains outside U.S. jurisdiction; he has not been tried in court.
Significance:
This case highlights the challenges in prosecuting data breaches involving national security and classified information, and the political complexities involved.
3. United States v. Marcus Hutchins
Facts:
Marcus Hutchins, a cybersecurity researcher who helped stop the WannaCry ransomware attack, was later charged with creating and distributing the Kronos banking Trojan, a malware designed to steal banking credentials.
Legal Issues:
He was charged under the CFAA and conspiracy for developing and distributing malware used in data theft.
Outcome:
Hutchins pled guilty in 2019 to charges related to his earlier activities and received a sentence of one year, which was reduced due to his cooperation and later positive contributions.
Significance:
This case highlights the blurred lines between hacking for malicious purposes and cybersecurity research, and the importance of intent in data breach prosecutions.
4. United States v. Jeremy Hammond
Facts:
Jeremy Hammond hacked into the private intelligence firm Stratfor and leaked millions of emails to WikiLeaks. The data breach exposed confidential client information and internal communications.
Legal Issues:
Hammond was charged with CFAA violations and identity theft due to unauthorized access and theft of protected data.
Outcome:
He pled guilty in 2013 and was sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Significance:
This case demonstrates federal prosecution of hacktivists and the use of CFAA to punish unauthorized access resulting in significant data breaches.
5. United States v. Gary McKinnon
Facts:
Gary McKinnon, a British hacker, accessed numerous U.S. military and NASA computers between 2001-2002, allegedly searching for evidence of UFOs. His activities caused system disruptions.
Legal Issues:
Charged with unauthorized access and causing damage under the CFAA. The U.S. sought his extradition for trial.
Outcome:
After prolonged legal battles, extradition was blocked by UK authorities on health grounds, so McKinnon was never prosecuted in the U.S.
Significance:
This case highlights legal and humanitarian challenges in prosecuting cross-border cybercrime cases involving data breaches.
6. United States v. Paige A. Thompson (“Erratic” Hacker)
Facts:
Paige Thompson, a former Amazon Web Services engineer, accessed and stole data from multiple cloud computing customers in 2019, exposing personal data of millions.
Legal Issues:
Thompson was charged under the CFAA and identity theft statutes for unauthorized access and theft of customer data.
Outcome:
She was arrested and faced trial; the case is ongoing but is expected to result in significant penalties.
Significance:
The case illustrates insider threats and the risks posed by employees with privileged access to sensitive data.
Key Legal Points in Data Breach and Theft Prosecutions
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA):
The primary federal statute used to prosecute unauthorized access and data theft.
Intent and Authorization:
Crucial to prove that the defendant intentionally accessed data without authorization or exceeded authorized access.
Identity Theft and Wire Fraud:
Often charged alongside data theft to cover use or sale of stolen data.
Extradition and International Jurisdiction:
Many cybercrime cases involve defendants outside the U.S., complicating prosecution.
Sentencing:
Penalties range from probation for minor breaches to decades in prison for large-scale or sensitive data theft.
RELATED Blog
0 comments