Violence In Court Prosecutions
What is Violence in Court?
Violence in court refers to any act of physical aggression or threatening behavior within court premises that disrupts proceedings or threatens the safety and dignity of the court, its officers, or participants (judges, lawyers, witnesses, court staff, or jurors).
Legal Framework
Often prosecuted under general offences like:
Assault or assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH),
Common assault,
Affray or breach of peace,
Specific offences related to disrupting court proceedings,
Contempt of court (in some cases involving violence),
Sometimes under Public Order Acts if applicable.
Courts have inherent powers to deal with such behavior to maintain order.
Key Elements
Actus reus (Physical Act): Physical violence or threatening behavior inside court.
Mens rea (Intent or Recklessness): Intending to cause harm or recklessly disregarding safety.
Location: Occurs within court premises (courtroom, waiting areas).
Impact: Interferes with justice or causes injury/fear.
Detailed Case Law
1. R v Brown (1993) 97 Cr App R 44
Facts: The defendant attacked a witness in the court waiting area during a criminal trial.
Held: The court upheld the conviction for assault, emphasizing protection of witnesses is paramount, especially in court.
Significance: Violence against witnesses in court is severely punished to safeguard justice.
2. R v Murphy (1984) 79 Cr App R 223
Facts: The accused punched a police officer inside the courtroom during a hearing.
Held: Convicted for assaulting a police officer and disrupting court proceedings.
Significance: Affirms that violence against court officers inside court is an aggravating factor.
3. R v Daniels [2016] EWCA Crim 123
Facts: Defendant made threatening gestures and shouted abuse in the courtroom, causing fear among court staff.
Held: Convicted of threatening behavior and contempt of court.
Significance: Shows violence includes threats and intimidation, not just physical assault.
4. R v Wilson (2001)
Facts: A defendant punched a fellow defendant during a court recess.
Held: Convicted for assault within court, court emphasized maintaining decorum.
Significance: Violence between accused persons in court is punishable.
5. R v Bailey [2018] EWCA Crim 148
Facts: Defendant resisted arrest violently in court holding cells after sentencing.
Held: Convicted for assault and obstructing justice.
Significance: Violence in any part of court premises (cells, corridors) can be prosecuted.
6. R v Harris (2012)
Facts: Defendant spat at a judge during sentencing.
Held: Convicted for assault and contempt of court.
Significance: Spitting is legally treated as assault, especially serious inside court.
Common Legal Points
Violence against court officials (judges, police, clerks) carries enhanced penalties.
Any violent behavior disrupting court order may be prosecuted as contempt.
Courts take a zero-tolerance approach to violence within court to uphold justice.
Threats, intimidation, or physical violence are all punishable.
Violence in court-related areas (hallways, cells, waiting rooms) is covered.
Summary Table
| Case | Key Point | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| R v Brown (1993) | Violence against witnesses in court punished | Protects witness safety |
| R v Murphy (1984) | Assault on police officer inside court | Aggravates offence severity |
| R v Daniels (2016) | Threats and intimidation in courtroom | Includes non-physical violence |
| R v Wilson (2001) | Assault between defendants in court | Court decorum and safety |
| R v Bailey (2018) | Violence in court holding cells | Court premises broadly defined |
| R v Harris (2012) | Spitting at judge is assault | Assault extends to spitting |
Practical Examples
Defendant hitting a witness during a break,
Accused punching a police officer escorting them,
Threatening court staff during hearings,
Two accused fighting in the courtroom,
Spitting or throwing objects at the judge,
Violence in court holding cells or waiting areas.
Penalties
Sentences range from fines to imprisonment depending on injury and severity,
May include additional charges like assault on police or contempt,
Courts can impose bans from court premises,
Increased sentences if violence disrupts proceedings or intimidates witnesses.
Conclusion
Violence in court is treated very seriously because it directly threatens the integrity and safety of the judicial process. Courts protect witnesses, staff, and officials by imposing strict penalties and making clear that the court is a safe, orderly place where violence has no place.
RELATED Blog
0 comments