Admissibility Of Electronic Records
Background
With the rapid digitization of data, the Indian legal system has evolved to recognize electronic records as evidence. The challenge has been to ensure their authenticity, reliability, and integrity while adapting traditional evidentiary rules.
Legal Framework for Admissibility of Electronic Records
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Amended)
Section 65A: Defines electronic records and allows their admissibility.
Section 65B: Provides the conditions under which electronic records are admissible as evidence.
Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act)
Validates electronic records and digital signatures.
Provides legal recognition to electronic evidence.
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act: The Crux for Electronic Evidence
Electronic record means data generated, stored, or transmitted in electronic form.
Section 65B lays down a “certificate rule”:
To admit electronic evidence, a certificate must be produced that:
Identifies the electronic record.
Describes the manner of its production.
Confirms the integrity of the device or process used.
Certifies that the record was produced during the relevant time.
Important Requirements Under Section 65B
The certificate should be signed by a person responsible for the device or the process.
The record must not be tampered with.
The procedure used should be reliable.
Important Case Laws on Admissibility of Electronic Records
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts: This landmark case clarified the requirements of Section 65B for admissibility of electronic evidence.
Legal Principle: The Supreme Court held that without compliance with Section 65B, electronic evidence is inadmissible.
Significance: Introduced a strict rule making Section 65B certificates mandatory for admissibility of electronic records.
2. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018) 2 SCC 801
Facts: The Court considered whether non-compliance with Section 65B should lead to automatic rejection of electronic evidence.
Legal Principle: The Court clarified that non-compliance is not always fatal; trial courts should assess genuineness and necessity.
Significance: Provided a more pragmatic approach balancing strict compliance and judicial discretion.
3. K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1
Facts: Though primarily a privacy case, it dealt with digital data and electronic surveillance.
Legal Principle: Recognized the importance of safeguards around electronic data and privacy concerns.
Significance: Emphasized that electronic data needs protection but admissibility depends on authenticity and legal standards.
4. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600
Facts: The Court dealt with electronic evidence in the form of call detail records (CDRs).
Legal Principle: Held that CDRs are admissible evidence, subject to proper certification.
Significance: Recognized CDRs as important electronic evidence under Section 65B.
5. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2013) 1 SCC 450
Facts: The case involved electronic documents presented without proper Section 65B certification.
Legal Principle: The Supreme Court reiterated that mere production of electronic documents is insufficient; mandatory compliance with Section 65B is essential.
Significance: Reinforced the importance of the certificate for admitting electronic evidence.
6. Khandelwal Tubes Ltd. v. CCE (2013) 10 SCC 292
Facts: Concerned the authenticity of electronic records in customs proceedings.
Legal Principle: The Court emphasized the requirement of maintaining the integrity and proper certification of electronic records.
Significance: Stressed the importance of a reliable chain of custody for electronic evidence.
Summary of Principles for Admissibility of Electronic Records
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Requirement of Certificate | Section 65B certificate is mandatory to prove electronic evidence admissible. |
| Authenticity & Integrity | Must establish that the data was not tampered with. |
| Chain of Custody | Proper handling and preservation of electronic evidence required. |
| Judicial Discretion | Courts may weigh genuineness and necessity even if minor procedural lapses occur. |
| Privacy & Data Protection | Electronic records should comply with privacy rights and legal safeguards. |
Practical Example
In a cybercrime case, the prosecution presents emails and chat messages as evidence. To admit this, they must provide a Section 65B certificate confirming:
The emails were retrieved from the server during the relevant time.
The process of retrieval is reliable.
The data has not been altered.
Without this certificate, the evidence risks being rejected.
RELATED Blog
0 comments