Wyoming Administrative Code Agency 038 - Wyoming Gaming Commission
Wyoming Administrative Code Agency 251 – Board of Veterinary Medicine
Overview
The Board of Veterinary Medicine in Wyoming, established under the Wyoming Administrative Code (WAC), Agency 251, is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing the practice of veterinary medicine within Wyoming.
Purpose and Functions of the Board
Licensing and Regulation: The Board licenses veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and veterinary facilities to ensure they meet required standards.
Enforcement of Standards: The Board enforces standards of professional conduct and practice to protect public health, animal welfare, and the interests of the veterinary profession.
Disciplinary Actions: It investigates complaints, conducts hearings, and imposes disciplinary measures for violations such as negligence, incompetence, or unethical behavior.
Rulemaking: The Board promulgates rules and regulations under its statutory authority to implement the laws governing veterinary medicine in Wyoming.
Continuing Education: It oversees requirements for continuing education to maintain licensure.
Authority and Statutory Basis
The Board operates under statutory authority granted by the Wyoming Legislature, which empowers it to:
Issue and renew veterinary licenses.
Establish ethical and professional standards.
Conduct investigations and disciplinary proceedings.
Administer examinations and assess fees.
Key Provisions of Agency 251
While specific rules vary, common provisions include:
Licensing Requirements: Educational qualifications, examinations, background checks.
Practice Standards: Requirements for record keeping, prescription practices, surgical procedures.
Disciplinary Grounds: Misconduct, incompetence, criminal convictions affecting practice, substance abuse.
Procedural Rules: Hearing procedures, appeal rights, confidentiality.
Illustrative Case Law (Hypothetical/Generic Examples)
1. In re License of Dr. Smith (Wyoming Board of Veterinary Medicine, 2015)
Facts: Dr. Smith faced disciplinary action after allegations of negligent treatment resulting in animal injury.
Issue: Whether the Board had sufficient grounds to suspend Dr. Smith’s license.
Ruling: The Board’s findings were upheld, emphasizing the Board’s broad authority to protect public and animal health.
Significance: Confirmed that veterinary boards have substantial discretion in interpreting professional standards and disciplining licensees.
2. Doe v. Wyoming Board of Veterinary Medicine (2018)
Facts: A licensee challenged the Board’s refusal to renew their license citing failure to complete continuing education.
Issue: Whether the Board acted arbitrarily or within its rulemaking authority.
Ruling: The court upheld the Board’s decision, reinforcing the importance of continuing education requirements.
Significance: Demonstrated the Board’s ability to enforce regulatory standards as a condition of licensure.
3. Jones v. Wyoming Board of Veterinary Medicine (2020)
Facts: Jones alleged the Board violated due process during a disciplinary hearing.
Issue: Examination of procedural safeguards.
Ruling: The court found the Board followed required procedures, including notice, opportunity to be heard, and impartial adjudication.
Significance: Reinforced the principle that administrative boards must adhere to fair procedures but are afforded wide latitude in decision-making.
Importance of the Board’s Role
Protecting Public and Animal Health: The Board ensures that veterinary practitioners maintain competency and ethical standards.
Maintaining Professional Integrity: By regulating conduct, it fosters public trust in veterinary services.
Providing a Mechanism for Accountability: Licensees are accountable to professional standards enforced by the Board.
Summary
The Wyoming Board of Veterinary Medicine (Agency 251) is a vital regulatory body that licenses and disciplines veterinary professionals to ensure high standards in veterinary care. It has broad authority granted by state law to enforce regulations, conduct hearings, and maintain public confidence in the profession. Case law affirms its regulatory powers, procedural fairness, and enforcement of licensure requirements.
RELATED Blog
0 comments