New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules Fis - Executive Director, Fish and Game Department
New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules – Fis: Executive Director, Fish and Game Department
Overview
The Fis chapter governs the role, responsibilities, and powers of the Executive Director of the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department. This department manages fish, wildlife, and related natural resources to ensure conservation, sustainable use, and public enjoyment.
Key Provisions
1. Role and Authority of the Executive Director
The Executive Director serves as the chief administrative officer for the Fish and Game Department.
Responsible for implementing policies set by the Fish and Game Commission.
Oversees daily operations, including enforcement, conservation programs, licensing, and public education.
2. Rulemaking and Enforcement
Authorized to propose rules for wildlife management, hunting, fishing seasons, and habitat protection.
Ensures enforcement of state laws related to fish and game through department staff.
Has authority to issue permits, licenses, and to regulate the taking of fish and wildlife.
3. Resource Management and Conservation
Leads development of management plans for species conservation, habitat restoration, and population control.
Coordinates with federal, state, and local agencies to align conservation efforts.
Responsible for public communication and education regarding sustainable resource use.
4. Administrative Duties
Manages the department’s budget, personnel, and strategic planning.
Oversees data collection, research, and reporting related to wildlife populations and environmental health.
Facilitates public input and advisory processes involving hunters, anglers, and other stakeholders.
Explanation of How This Functions
The Executive Director acts as the executive branch of the Fish and Game Commission, implementing policy and managing the department’s broad mandate.
Authority is both administrative (budget, staff) and regulatory (rulemaking, enforcement).
The role balances resource conservation with public access and economic interests tied to hunting, fishing, and outdoor recreation.
Effective leadership here requires navigating complex environmental, legal, and stakeholder challenges.
Hypothetical Case Law Example
Doe v. New Hampshire Fish and Game Department (Fictitious for illustration)
Facts: A group of hunters challenged a new seasonal restriction imposed by the Executive Director, arguing it exceeded delegated authority and was not supported by sufficient scientific evidence.
Issue: Whether the Executive Director acted within statutory and rulemaking authority in enacting the new restriction.
Holding: The court upheld the restriction, noting that the Executive Director’s rulemaking authority includes making science-based decisions to conserve wildlife populations and that the process involved adequate public notice and comment.
Significance: Confirms the Executive Director’s broad authority to manage fish and game resources through regulatory measures, provided due process is followed.
Summary
The Fis rules set out the responsibilities and authority of the Executive Director of the Fish and Game Department in New Hampshire. This role oversees conservation, enforcement, rulemaking, and administration for the state’s fish and wildlife resources. Case law supports the Director’s ability to make and enforce conservation rules within the framework of public input and scientific evidence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments