92nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003
🔹 92nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003
1. Background
The 92nd Amendment Act was enacted to safeguard the interests of certain socially and educationally backward classes (also known as Other Backward Classes or OBCs) in the context of education and employment.
This amendment specifically deals with reservation policies aimed at improving representation of backward classes in educational institutions.
It was passed in response to demands for constitutional backing to the government's efforts to provide reservations to OBCs.
2. Key Objective
To amend Articles 15 and 16 of the Indian Constitution to:
Enable the State to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens.
Provide reservation in educational institutions and public employment to these classes without violating the fundamental rights of equality.
3. Details of the Amendment
The amendment made the following key changes:
| Article | Before 92nd Amendment | After 92nd Amendment |
|---|---|---|
| Article 15(4) | Allowed the State to make special provisions for SCs/STs. | Extended to include “any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens” (OBCs). |
| Article 16(4) | Allowed reservation in public employment for SCs/STs. | Extended to include reservation for backward classes of citizens, in addition to SCs/STs. |
4. Textual Changes
Article 15(4) Inserted Clause:
"Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes."
Article 16(4) Inserted Clause:
"Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favor of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State."
5. Significance
The amendment constitutionally validates reservations for OBCs in education and employment.
It recognizes the State’s power to identify and uplift socially and educationally backward classes.
Ensures affirmative action measures are constitutionally protected and not subject to challenge under Articles 14 (Equality before law) or 16 (Equality of opportunity).
6. Relevant Case Law
6.1 M. Nagaraj v. Union of India (2006)
The Supreme Court held that reservations for backward classes in promotions must satisfy the following criteria:
The State must demonstrate backwardness of the class.
Show inadequate representation in public employment.
Establish that the reservation does not affect the efficiency of administration.
This ruling placed certain restrictions on the scope of Article 16(4) introduced by the 92nd Amendment.
6.2 Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018)
The Supreme Court overruled the Nagaraj judgment partially, relaxing the conditions imposed on reservations in promotions for SCs/STs.
Held that States are not required to collect quantifiable data on backwardness and inadequate representation before providing reservations in promotions to SC/STs.
However, this ruling did not affect the reservations under OBC category but marked a significant judicial development.
6.3 Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) (Before 92nd Amendment)
This case laid down the principles of reservation for backward classes, such as the 50% cap on total reservations and the exclusion of the “creamy layer” from OBC benefits.
The 92nd Amendment built upon these principles by giving constitutional backing to such reservations.
7. Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Amendment Number | 92nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003 |
| Articles Amended | Articles 15 and 16 |
| Key Change | Extended reservation to socially and educationally backward classes (OBCs) |
| Purpose | To provide constitutional protection for OBC reservations |
| Significant Judgments | M. Nagaraj (2006), Jarnail Singh (2018), Indra Sawhney (1992) |
| Impact | Strengthened affirmative action policies in education and employment |
8. Conclusion
The 92nd Amendment was a significant step in affirming and safeguarding the rights of socially and educationally backward classes in India. By explicitly including OBCs in Articles 15(4) and 16(4), it allowed the State to continue and expand reservation policies in education and public employment to promote social justice.
Judicial interpretations post this amendment have aimed at balancing the principles of equality with the need for affirmative action, ensuring that such provisions are not arbitrary and are implemented fairly.
RELATED Blog
0 comments