Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 951 - OREGON FILM AND VIDEO OFFICE
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 951 — Oregon Film and Video Office
Overview
The Oregon Film and Video Office (OFVO) operates under Chapter 951 of the Oregon Administrative Rules. It is tasked with:
Promoting Oregon as a location for film and video production.
Providing support services to filmmakers and production companies.
Administering incentives or grant programs to encourage local production.
Coordinating with local governments and communities to facilitate filming.
Functions and Powers
The administrative rules likely specify:
Authority and scope of the office.
Eligibility criteria for incentives or grants.
Application and approval procedures for production support.
Conditions and restrictions attached to funding or permits.
Responsibilities of applicants and producers.
Collaboration protocols with other agencies and entities.
Legal Principles in Administrative Agency Context
Though specific case law on OFVO may be limited, legal principles governing administrative agencies apply, including:
Rulemaking Authority
The agency must act within the scope of authority delegated by statute (even if not citing statute here, the idea is that agencies have limits).
Procedural Fairness
When approving or denying applications for incentives or permits, the agency must follow fair procedures and provide reasons.
Discretion and Reasonableness
Agency decisions must be reasonable and not arbitrary or capricious.
Judicial Review
Agency actions can be reviewed by courts for legality and adherence to procedural requirements.
Hypothetical Case Law Illustrations
🔹 Case 1: Denial of Film Incentive Grant
Facts:
A production company applied for a grant under OFVO rules but was denied without clear explanation.
Issue:
Did the agency breach procedural fairness?
Holding:
The court found that denial without providing reasons violated principles of procedural fairness. The agency was required to explain its decision and allow an appeal.
Principle:
Administrative agencies must provide adequate notice and reasons for denying applications affecting rights or interests.
🔹 Case 2: Agency Exceeds Its Authority
Facts:
The OFVO imposed conditions on a film permit beyond what is allowed under its rules.
Issue:
Was the agency acting within its authority?
Holding:
The court ruled the agency exceeded its rulemaking power by imposing unauthorized conditions, invalidating those parts of the permit.
Principle:
Agencies must act within the boundaries of their rulemaking and enforcement powers.
🔹 Case 3: Arbitrary Decision-Making
Facts:
Two similar film productions applied for location permits; one was approved, the other denied without clear justification.
Issue:
Was the agency’s decision arbitrary?
Holding:
The court held the inconsistent treatment was arbitrary and capricious, ordering the agency to apply standards uniformly.
Principle:
Agency decisions must be consistent and based on reasonable standards.
Summary
| Aspect | Description |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Promote Oregon film and video production |
| Functions | Support productions, administer incentives |
| Decision-Making | Must be fair, reasonable, within authority |
| Applicant Rights | Entitled to clear rules, fair procedures |
| Judicial Review | Courts ensure agency compliance with rules |
Conclusion
The Oregon Film and Video Office under Chapter 951 plays a crucial role in facilitating film production in Oregon by providing support and incentives. Administrative law principles ensure the office operates fairly and within its delegated authority. Any disputes over agency decisions, such as denial of support or imposition of conditions, are subject to judicial review based on fairness, reasonableness, and legality.
RELATED Blog
0 comments