Fundamental Duties Enforceable by Law

Fundamental Duties Enforceable by Law

1. Introduction

Fundamental Duties were added to the Constitution of India by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, under Article 51A.

They set out the moral obligations of all citizens to help promote a spirit of patriotism and uphold the unity of India.

Unlike Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties were originally non-justiciable, meaning they could not be enforced in a court of law.

Over time, the judiciary and legislature have interpreted and enacted laws to make certain duties enforceable.

2. Nature of Fundamental Duties

They are moral and ethical obligations.

Not enforceable by courts originally (Article 51A does not provide a remedy for their violation).

Aim to encourage citizens to act responsibly towards the nation.

Serve as a guide to citizens and the state for promoting constitutional ideals.

3. Are Fundamental Duties Enforceable by Law?

The Constitution does not explicitly empower courts to enforce Fundamental Duties.

However, the legislature can enact laws to give effect to Fundamental Duties.

When laws are enacted to enforce these duties, violations of these laws become punishable.

4. Examples of Laws Enforcing Fundamental Duties

Duty to protect environment (Article 51A(g)) is enforced by laws like:

The Environment Protection Act, 1986

The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981

Duty to preserve the heritage of the country (Article 51A(f)) is enforced by laws protecting monuments and archaeological sites.

Duty to promote harmony and brotherhood (Article 51A(e)) is enforced by laws against hate speech, communal violence.

5. Judicial Interpretation

Several judgments have discussed the enforceability of Fundamental Duties, balancing them against Fundamental Rights and public interest.

A. K. K. Verma v. Union of India (1988)

The Supreme Court observed that Fundamental Duties act as a code of conduct for citizens and are not enforceable in courts but can be enforced through laws enacted by Parliament or State Legislatures.

B. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) – Environmental Protection Case

The Court read Fundamental Duty (Article 51A(g)) regarding environment protection as binding.

It used this duty to strengthen environmental laws and held that citizens and government authorities have a duty to protect the environment.

Demonstrated that Fundamental Duties can be used as a basis to enforce laws and public interest.

C. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)

Though primarily about sexual harassment, the Court referred to Fundamental Duties emphasizing the duty to uphold dignity of women.

Used these duties to fill gaps in the law until legislation was enacted.

D. Balco Employees Union v. Union of India (2002)

Court held that Fundamental Duties can be used to interpret laws and policies to promote social justice and responsibility.

6. Constitutional Debate

Some scholars argue that Fundamental Duties should be enforceable to make citizens accountable.

Others say their moral nature makes enforceability difficult.

The judiciary often uses Fundamental Duties as guiding principles rather than grounds for direct enforcement.

7. Summary of Enforceability

AspectExplanation
Are Fundamental Duties justiciable?No, originally not enforceable in courts directly
Can laws be enacted to enforce them?Yes, Parliament and State Legislatures can enact laws
Can courts enforce these duties directly?Courts enforce duties indirectly by upholding laws based on duties
Examples of enforceable dutiesProtection of environment, preservation of heritage, promoting harmony

8. Conclusion

Fundamental Duties act as a moral compass for citizens.

Although not enforceable in a direct manner by courts, they influence legislation and judicial interpretation.

The judiciary has used Fundamental Duties as a tool to reinforce social responsibility and complement Fundamental Rights.

With growing awareness, many duties are being enforced through appropriate laws, reflecting their evolving significance in India's constitutional framework.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments