Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Features of Indian Federalism
Indian Federalism: Overview
India is a federal country with a unique structure. It combines elements of both federalism and unitarianism, creating a system that is quasi-federal. This means that while powers are divided between the Centre and the States, the Centre has certain overriding powers.
Indian federalism shows both symmetrical and asymmetrical features, meaning some aspects are uniformly applicable to all states (symmetrical), while others are special or different for certain states (asymmetrical).
Symmetrical Features of Indian Federalism
Symmetrical federalism means equal distribution of powers, rights, and responsibilities among all states.
Key Symmetrical Features
Uniformity in Legislative Powers:
The powers of the states and the Centre are divided uniformly through the Seventh Schedule (Union List, State List, and Concurrent List). All states (except some special cases) have the same legislative powers as per this schedule.
Same Constitution for All States:
All states in India operate under the same Constitution without any special constitutional provisions for most states.
Uniformity in Executive Structure:
Every state has a Governor appointed by the President, a Council of Ministers, and a Chief Minister.
Single Judiciary:
India has a single integrated judiciary with the Supreme Court at the apex and High Courts for states, ensuring uniform interpretation of laws.
Single Citizenship:
Citizens of India have single citizenship regardless of the state they belong to, unlike the US where states have separate citizenship.
Equal Representation in Rajya Sabha:
All states are represented in the Rajya Sabha (Council of States), albeit the number of seats varies by population, but the principle of representation is uniformly applied.
Case Law Reflecting Symmetrical Federalism
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977)
The Supreme Court observed that the distribution of powers between the Centre and States is governed uniformly by the Constitution, showing the symmetrical nature of Indian federalism.
Asymmetrical Features of Indian Federalism
Asymmetrical federalism means certain states or regions are granted special status or powers that differ from other states.
Key Asymmetrical Features
Special Provisions under the Constitution (Articles 370, 371 and its sub-clauses):
Article 370 (Now abrogated in August 2019): Provided special autonomous status to Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) giving it a separate Constitution and special privileges.
Article 371 and its sub-clauses: Provide special provisions for certain states like Maharashtra, Gujarat, Nagaland, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Sikkim, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, and others. These provisions include special legislative powers, protection of local customs, and administrative autonomy.
Different Legislative Competence:
Some states have exclusive powers to make laws on subjects in the Union List or special rights to appoint governors or local councils.
Special Administrative Arrangements:
For example, Nagaland has special provisions allowing the state legislature to regulate the operation of certain laws passed by Parliament. Similarly, Andhra Pradesh was accorded special provisions to protect the rights of people in Telangana region.
Governance Structures:
Some states have Autonomous District Councils (in Northeast India), allowing greater autonomy to tribal areas.
Financial Autonomy:
Certain states have special financial arrangements or grants due to their special status.
Case Law Reflecting Asymmetrical Federalism
State of Nagaland v. Union of India (1969)
The Supreme Court upheld the special legislative and administrative powers granted to Nagaland under Article 371(A), acknowledging the asymmetrical nature of Indian federalism.
Re: The Constitution of Jammu & Kashmir (1959)
The Supreme Court recognized the special status of Jammu & Kashmir under Article 370, reflecting asymmetry in federal relations.
Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
The Court discussed the use of Article 356 (President’s Rule) and emphasized that the Centre’s overriding powers must be used sparingly, highlighting tensions in the federal balance.
Why Asymmetry?
To accommodate diverse historical, cultural, linguistic, and ethnic identities.
To address regional aspirations and conflicts.
To allow peaceful coexistence within a diverse country.
To ensure administrative convenience in sensitive or difficult regions.
Summary: Comparison of Symmetrical vs. Asymmetrical Features
| Aspect | Symmetrical Features | Asymmetrical Features |
|---|---|---|
| Legislative Powers | Uniform division of powers across states | Special legislative powers for some states |
| Constitutional Status | Same Constitution for all states | Special constitutional provisions for some states (e.g., Articles 370, 371) |
| Governance | Uniform governance model | Special administrative arrangements for some states/regions |
| Representation | Equal framework of representation | Certain states have special safeguards |
| Citizenship | Single Indian citizenship | No separate citizenship for any state, but special protections exist |
| Judiciary | Single integrated judiciary | No asymmetry here; judiciary is uniform |
Conclusion
Indian federalism is a unique blend of symmetry and asymmetry. While the basic structure and framework apply equally to all states, asymmetrical provisions allow flexibility to accommodate the country’s immense diversity and maintain unity in diversity.
The system helps balance central authority with regional autonomy, maintaining the overall cohesion of the Union while respecting the special needs of certain regions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments