Ohio Administrative Code Title 122:11 - Business Development Division
Ohio Administrative Code
Title 122:11 – Business Development Division
1. Overview and Purpose
OAC Title 122:11 governs the Business Development Division within the Ohio Department of Development (ODOD). This Division is responsible for administering economic development programs aimed at:
Attracting new businesses to Ohio.
Supporting the expansion of existing businesses.
Stimulating private investment and job creation.
Providing financial assistance through grants, loans, and tax incentives.
Fostering small business growth, especially in underserved communities.
The rules within Title 122:11 implement statutory authority found in the Ohio Revised Code (ORC), often under Chapters 122 and 166.
2. Scope of the Division’s Responsibilities
The Business Development Division oversees programs such as:
166 Loan Program: Loans for small and medium-sized businesses to support expansion or job creation.
Roadwork Development (629) Fund: Funding for infrastructure improvements necessary to support new or expanding businesses.
Targeted Industry Grants: Supporting specific industries such as advanced manufacturing, logistics, and technology.
Brownfield Remediation and Site Readiness Initiatives.
Small Business Assistance Programs, including minority and women-owned business support.
3. Key Regulatory Provisions of Title 122:11
A. Application and Eligibility Criteria
Applicants must submit detailed proposals including business plans, job creation projections, and financial statements.
Applicants must demonstrate need for public assistance, economic viability, and community impact.
B. Financial Assistance Terms
Terms of loans, grants, or tax credits vary by program, but often include:
Job creation targets.
Match funding requirements.
Repayment terms and interest rates.
Clawback provisions for non-compliance.
C. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
Awardees must submit periodic progress and financial reports.
Non-compliance (e.g., failure to meet job creation goals) may trigger repayment, interest increases, or ineligibility for future funding.
D. Enforcement and Penalties
The Division may revoke awards, demand repayment, or initiate legal action in case of fraud or default.
Fraudulent misrepresentation on applications can also result in criminal referral.
4. Legal and Administrative Principles
Contractual Nature: Award agreements are binding contracts between the state and recipient.
Discretionary Authority: The Division has broad discretion to select, modify, or deny applications.
Transparency: Rules ensure fairness and accountability in distribution of public funds.
Equity Focus: Some programs are legally mandated to prioritize economically distressed communities or disadvantaged business owners.
5. Ohio Case Law Involving Title 122:11 Programs
Case 1: CapitalEdge v. Ohio Department of Development (Ohio Ct. App., 2016)
Facts: CapitalEdge, a small manufacturer, received a 166 loan but failed to meet job creation requirements. The state demanded partial repayment.
Issue: Whether the clawback provision in the loan agreement was enforceable.
Holding: The court upheld the state’s position.
Reasoning: The agreement clearly tied funding to performance outcomes. The clawback provision was enforceable as a contract.
Significance: Reinforces that funding agreements are legally binding and subject to state enforcement.
Case 2: GreenTech Solutions v. State of Ohio (Ohio Ct. Common Pleas, 2019)
Facts: GreenTech’s application for an infrastructure grant under the Roadwork Development Fund was denied after it failed to secure private financing.
Issue: Whether the denial was arbitrary or violated due process.
Holding: The court ruled in favor of the state.
Reasoning: The application did not meet the threshold criteria, and the state followed appropriate administrative procedures.
Significance: Highlights the wide latitude the state has in approving or denying economic development funding.
Case 3: Omega Logistics v. Ohio Development Services Agency (Ohio Ct. App., 2021)
Facts: Omega Logistics was awarded a grant based on job creation promises but failed to meet hiring targets. The agency initiated repayment and imposed penalties.
Issue: Whether the penalties were proportional and contractually valid.
Holding: The court upheld the penalties.
Reasoning: The company accepted funds under known terms and failed to comply. The agency’s actions were within its authority.
Significance: Supports robust enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance.
6. Practical Implications
For Businesses:
Due Diligence: Businesses must carefully review all terms before accepting funds.
Performance Metrics: Job creation, capital investment, and community impact are critical to maintaining eligibility.
Compliance: Regular reporting and transparency are essential to avoid penalties.
For State Agencies:
Oversight: Must ensure fair evaluation, selection, and monitoring of all funded projects.
Enforcement: Clawbacks and penalties must be applied consistently and within contractual limits.
7. Summary Table – OAC Title 122:11 Highlights
| Topic | Description |
|---|---|
| Administering Agency | Business Development Division, Ohio Dept. of Development |
| Programs Governed | 166 Loans, Roadwork Fund, Targeted Industry Grants |
| Applicant Requirements | Financial viability, job creation, matching funds |
| Award Conditions | Contracts, performance metrics, clawback clauses |
| Legal Standing | Enforceable contracts; subject to judicial review |
| Common Issues | Non-compliance, fraud, and job target shortfalls |
8. Conclusion
Ohio Administrative Code Title 122:11 outlines the structure, eligibility, and enforcement mechanisms for economic development programs administered by the Business Development Division. These programs play a vital role in Ohio’s job creation and economic revitalization strategy. Through case law, Ohio courts have reinforced the state’s authority to impose conditions, enforce agreements, and deny applications when statutory or regulatory requirements are unmet.
RELATED Blog
0 comments