Washington Administrative Code Title 420 - Recreation and Conservation Office (Salmon Recovery Funding Board)
Overview of WAC Title 420
WAC Title 420 governs rules related to the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), which administers programs for natural resource conservation, recreation, and salmon recovery in Washington State. The Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) is a key part of this framework, created to allocate funding for salmon recovery projects consistent with state and federal laws.
Key Components of WAC Title 420
Purpose and Authority:
The RCO operates under Washington state statutes (notably RCW 79A.15 and related statutes).
The SRFB is established under these provisions to manage and distribute state and federal funds aimed at restoring salmon habitats.
The code sets procedures for funding application, project prioritization, grant awards, monitoring, and accountability.
Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB):
The SRFB is composed of members appointed by the Governor, Legislature, and relevant state agencies.
Its mission is to fund projects that protect and restore salmon habitat consistent with salmon recovery plans.
The Board evaluates grant applications based on scientific merit, cost-effectiveness, and alignment with regional recovery strategies.
Project Eligibility and Funding:
Projects must be consistent with regional salmon recovery plans and benefit salmon populations.
Eligible projects include habitat restoration, barrier removal, land acquisition, and protection of critical areas.
Funding is granted through competitive processes, with transparent criteria and public review.
Grant Administration:
Recipients must comply with reporting and monitoring requirements.
The RCO oversees grant implementation to ensure funds are used effectively.
The code establishes provisions for audits, financial accountability, and enforcement actions in case of non-compliance.
Relevant Statutory Background
The Salmon Recovery Act (RCW 77.85) provides the statutory authority for the SRFB and its funding mechanisms.
The RCO implements this law through WAC Title 420, creating detailed administrative rules.
Case Law Related to Salmon Recovery Funding and WAC Title 420
While there isn't a vast body of case law directly interpreting WAC Title 420 or SRFB procedures, there are important decisions that touch on environmental administrative processes and salmon recovery programs in Washington. Below are some relevant legal principles and cases:
1. Washington Environmental Council v. Bellon, 732 F.3d 1131 (9th Cir. 2013)
This case upheld Washington’s water quality standards and the state's responsibility to protect salmon habitat.
It affirmed the state's authority to implement and enforce environmental standards consistent with federal laws.
Relevant because it underscores the legal foundation for agencies like the RCO and SRFB to regulate and fund salmon habitat restoration.
2. Citizens for Clean Air v. Public Utility District No. 1, 120 Wn.2d 709 (1993)
This case established that administrative agencies must follow procedural fairness and transparency in rulemaking and grant decisions.
Applied here, it supports the procedural safeguards in WAC Title 420 regarding public input and fair evaluation of funding applications.
3. Henderson v. Department of Ecology, 159 Wn.2d 231 (2006)
This decision clarified the extent of administrative discretion in environmental permitting and funding.
It supports the discretion of the SRFB in prioritizing projects based on scientific and policy criteria within the bounds of statutory authority.
Practical Implications of WAC Title 420
For grant applicants: Understanding WAC Title 420 is crucial to comply with funding requirements, prepare strong applications, and ensure project eligibility.
For agencies and boards: It provides a framework for transparent decision-making, balancing environmental priorities with fiscal responsibility.
For public and stakeholders: WAC Title 420 ensures public participation and accountability in salmon recovery efforts.
Summary
WAC Title 420 provides the administrative framework for the RCO and SRFB to manage salmon recovery funding.
It specifies project eligibility, grant procedures, and accountability mechanisms.
Case law supports the agency's authority and the procedural fairness embedded in the rules.
These rules play a key role in Washington State’s broader effort to protect and restore salmon habitats, critical for ecological and economic reasons.
RELATED Blog
0 comments