Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 925 - DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, PRESCRIPTION DRUG AFFORDABILITY BOARD
General Explanation: Prescription Drug Affordability Boards (PDA Boards)
1. Purpose and Function
Prescription Drug Affordability Boards are administrative bodies established by states to:
Control and regulate the cost of prescription drugs.
Review prices of certain prescription drugs to ensure affordability.
Recommend or set maximum allowable prices for prescription drugs to protect consumers and health care systems.
2. Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS)
The DCBS is generally responsible for overseeing consumer protection in business areas, including insurance and healthcare.
Under Chapter 925, the DCBS likely administers or supervises the Prescription Drug Affordability Board.
The DCBS ensures that the board complies with procedural rules, including investigations, hearings, and rulemaking.
3. Key Functions of the Prescription Drug Affordability Board
Review and assess high-cost prescription drugs.
Evaluate the impact of drug prices on consumers and healthcare payers.
Set or recommend affordable pricing limits.
Monitor compliance with pricing limits.
Conduct hearings and investigations regarding drug prices.
4. Procedural Aspects
Rulemaking: The board has authority to create rules for implementation, following administrative procedure.
Hearings: If disputes arise, hearings are held for affected parties to present evidence.
Enforcement: The board can enforce price limits and impose penalties for violations.
5. Legal Authority and Challenges
The board operates under delegated authority from the state legislature.
Its actions can be subject to judicial review if parties challenge the legality or reasonableness of price limits or procedures.
Courts typically assess whether the board acted within its statutory authority and followed fair procedures.
6. Hypothetical Case Law Examples (Illustrative, Not Real)
Case A: A pharmaceutical company challenges the board’s price limit on a drug, claiming the board exceeded its authority. The court examines the scope of the board’s delegated power and upholds the board’s rule as reasonable.
Case B: A consumer group sues, alleging the board failed to consider certain economic factors in setting prices. The court orders the board to conduct a more thorough review in future decisions.
Case C: A drug manufacturer ignores the price cap set by the board; the board imposes penalties which are later upheld by the courts.
7. Importance
These rules help balance the interests of consumers needing affordable medication and companies needing reasonable profits.
They reflect the increasing role of administrative agencies in regulating healthcare markets.
Effective administration ensures transparency, fairness, and public trust.
Summary:
While I cannot provide the exact text or case law specifically tied to Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 925, the Prescription Drug Affordability Board under the Department of Consumer and Business Services likely operates as an administrative agency tasked with regulating drug prices to ensure affordability, following procedures of rulemaking, hearings, and enforcement. Its actions are subject to legal scrutiny for adherence to authority and fairness.
RELATED Blog
0 comments