South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 89 - OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR-MINING COUNCIL OF SOUTH CAROLINA
South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 89
Office of the Governor - Mining Council of South Carolina
Overview
The Mining Council of South Carolina, operating under the Office of the Governor, is an administrative body responsible for overseeing the regulation, development, and reclamation of mineral resources in South Carolina. The Council’s functions include reviewing mining permits, advising on mining policies, and ensuring compliance with environmental and safety standards.
Key Functions and Powers of the Mining Council
Permit Review and Recommendations: Evaluates applications for mining operations and issues recommendations or approvals.
Regulatory Oversight: Ensures mining activities comply with safety, environmental, and land reclamation requirements.
Advisory Role: Advises the Governor and state agencies on mining policy, regulations, and best practices.
Public Engagement: Conducts hearings or meetings to involve stakeholders and the public in mining-related decisions.
Relevant Legal and Constitutional Principles
The Mining Council, as an administrative agency, operates under delegated authority and is bound by constitutional protections, particularly concerning due process and separation of powers.
1. Delegated Authority and Agency Expertise
The Council’s powers are delegated by the Governor and the legislature.
Courts generally defer to the agency’s expertise in technical matters like mining and environmental protection.
Case Law Principle:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984): Courts defer to reasonable agency interpretations within the scope of their delegated authority.
2. Due Process in Permit Approvals and Enforcement
When the Council’s decisions affect property interests, such as approval or denial of mining permits, due process requires:
Notice of proposed actions or hearings.
Opportunity for a Hearing to present evidence and arguments.
Fair and Impartial Decision-Making.
Reasoned Decision supported by substantial evidence.
Case Law:
Goldberg v. Kelly (1970): Due process requires hearings before deprivation of significant interests.
Mathews v. Eldridge (1976): Balances governmental and private interests to determine procedural protections.
3. Judicial Review of Council Decisions
Courts review the Council’s decisions to ensure they:
Act within the scope of authority.
Follow required procedures.
Are supported by substantial evidence and not arbitrary or capricious.
Case Law:
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass’n v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. (1983): Agency decisions must be rational and supported by evidence.
4. Separation of Powers and Checks on Administrative Power
The Mining Council is part of the executive branch and must not exceed its administrative role.
Courts exercise judicial review to maintain the balance of powers and uphold constitutional safeguards.
Case Law:
Marbury v. Madison (1803): Establishes the judiciary’s role in reviewing administrative actions for constitutionality.
Application to the Mining Council of South Carolina
The Council must provide fair notice and opportunity to affected parties in permit reviews or enforcement proceedings.
Decisions must be reasoned and evidence-based, respecting private property and environmental concerns.
Judicial review acts as a check to ensure the Council’s adherence to legal standards and procedural fairness.
Summary
Chapter 89 governs the Mining Council of South Carolina’s oversight of mining operations under the Office of the Governor.
The Council exercises delegated authority to regulate mining permits, environmental compliance, and policy advice.
Due process protections apply in permit decisions affecting property rights.
Courts defer to reasonable agency expertise but ensure decisions are lawful, rational, and procedurally fair.
Foundational cases such as Chevron, Goldberg, Mathews, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers, and Marbury guide the scope, review, and limits of the Council’s authority.
0 comments