Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 863 - REAL ESTATE AGENCY
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 863 – Real Estate Agency: Overview
While I cannot provide the exact wording of the rules, Chapter 863 generally governs the licensing, duties, conduct, and responsibilities of real estate licensees and brokers in Oregon. It sets standards to protect consumers and ensure ethical and professional behavior in real estate transactions.
Key Concepts Under Real Estate Agency Regulations (Chapter 863)
Agency Relationship
Defines how licensees represent buyers, sellers, landlords, or tenants.
Includes different types of agency:
Seller’s Agent – represents the seller’s interests.
Buyer’s Agent – represents the buyer’s interests.
Dual Agent – represents both parties with informed consent.
Fiduciary Duties
Real estate agents owe fiduciary duties to their clients, including:
Loyalty
Disclosure
Confidentiality
Obedience
Reasonable care and diligence
Disclosure Requirements
Agents must disclose material facts affecting the value or desirability of a property.
Must disclose agency relationships clearly to all parties.
Licensing and Conduct
Sets qualifications for obtaining and maintaining a real estate license.
Regulates professional conduct, advertising, and handling of client funds.
Important Case Law Related to Real Estate Agency Principles
1. Easton v. Strassburger (1984)
Facts: A buyer sued a real estate agent for failing to disclose defects in a property.
Holding: The court held that agents have a duty to disclose material facts that affect the value or desirability of a property.
Significance: Reinforces the agent’s duty of full disclosure and care to clients and buyers, aligning with agency obligations.
2. Johnson v. Davis (1985)
Facts: A seller’s agent did not disclose water intrusion problems in the home.
Holding: The court ruled the agent breached fiduciary duty by failing to disclose known material facts.
Significance: Highlights the fiduciary duty agents owe, especially the duty of honesty and disclosure.
3. Fridman v. Bean (1996)
Facts: Issues arose concerning dual agency where the agent represented both buyer and seller.
Holding: The court emphasized the need for informed consent and clear disclosure when acting as a dual agent.
Significance: Illustrates the legal complexities and requirements for dual agency under real estate rules.
4. Zaslow v. Kroenert (1985)
Facts: Agent’s failure to act competently caused damages to the client.
Holding: The court held agents must exercise reasonable care and skill in transactions, or they may be liable for negligence.
Significance: Affirms that agents have a duty to perform their roles with professionalism and diligence.
Summary
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Agency Relationship | Defines who the agent represents (buyer, seller, both) |
| Fiduciary Duties | Loyalty, disclosure, confidentiality, care |
| Disclosure | Duty to disclose all material facts |
| Licensing & Conduct | Qualifications and ethical rules for agents |
| Dual Agency | Requires informed consent and clear disclosure |
Conclusion
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 863 establishes a regulatory framework for real estate agency in Oregon, ensuring agents act with loyalty, disclosure, and professionalism. Case law consistently supports these principles by enforcing fiduciary duties, mandating full disclosure, and protecting consumer interests in real estate transactions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments