South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 127 - South Carolina Occupational Health and Safety Review Board [Repealed]
The South Carolina Occupational Health and Safety Review Board (SCOHSRB) was established to provide a formal process for reviewing disputes related to the state's occupational health and safety regulations. However, Chapter 127 of the South Carolina Code of Regulations, which governed the SCOHSRB, was repealed, meaning that the provisions and rules in this chapter are no longer in effect.
Here’s an explanation of the roles and functions the board would have had, prior to its repeal:
1. Establishment and Purpose
The South Carolina Occupational Health and Safety Review Board was likely created as part of the state's efforts to regulate and enforce workplace safety standards, particularly in response to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). The Review Board would have been responsible for:
Reviewing decisions made by the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (LLR) concerning occupational health and safety standards.
Hearing appeals or disputes from employers or employees who were affected by citations, penalties, or enforcement actions related to workplace safety.
Ensuring that decisions about safety standards and penalties were made in accordance with state regulations and the rights of workers and employers.
2. Authority and Powers
The board likely had the authority to:
Review Cases: The primary function of the board would have been to review cases where there was a dispute over a safety citation, penalty, or enforcement decision.
Hear Appeals: If an employer or employee disagreed with a safety violation citation or penalty imposed by the state’s occupational health and safety agency, they could appeal to the Review Board for reconsideration.
Rule on Petitions: Individuals or companies could petition the board for variances or exceptions from certain safety standards based on specific circumstances, such as the impracticality of meeting a particular standard in a unique situation.
Impose or Adjust Penalties: In cases where violations were confirmed, the board could have had the authority to adjust the fines or penalties imposed by the state.
3. Process of Appeal or Review
The process would likely have involved:
Filing a Petition: An employer or employee could file an appeal or petition with the board.
Hearing the Case: The board would hold hearings to evaluate the facts, listen to arguments from both sides, and review evidence.
Final Decision: After reviewing the case, the board would issue a decision. This could include affirming the citation, reducing the penalty, or issuing a variance.
In cases where the decision made by the board was not satisfactory to either party, further appeals could have been made to higher courts or agencies.
4. Relevance of the Repeal
The repeal of this chapter indicates that the board no longer exists or has been replaced by another mechanism or agency. This could be because:
Integration into Other Agencies: The responsibilities of the SCOHSRB might have been transferred to another existing body, such as the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (LLR), which continues to handle safety issues.
Streamlining of Procedures: The review processes for occupational safety might now be handled through a more streamlined or modern approach that doesn't require a separate board.
Federal Oversight: With the federal OSHA in place, South Carolina might have felt that the state's review board was redundant or that its functions were better handled at the federal level.
5. Impact of the Repeal
The repeal of Chapter 127 means that:
No Independent Review Board: There is no longer a separate state body dedicated to hearing disputes regarding workplace safety.
Possible Shifts in Enforcement: Workers and employers who disagree with safety-related enforcement actions might now need to take disputes directly to the state’s labor department or federal OSHA for resolution.
Changes in Legal Framework: The repeal might indicate a shift in how South Carolina manages occupational health and safety complaints, potentially focusing more on administrative solutions rather than judicial or quasi-judicial ones.
While Chapter 127 is no longer in effect, the core principles of workplace safety still exist under state law and federal regulations. The removal of the Review Board does not eliminate safety laws; it just alters the structure by which disputes or appeals are handled. The Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation (LLR) would likely continue to handle enforcement, and there would still be avenues for legal recourse for workers or employers in cases of disputes.
RELATED Blog
0 comments