Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 391A - Training, Professional Development and Incentives
Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 391A — Training, Professional Development and Incentives
Detailed Explanation with Case Law
Overview
NAC Chapter 391A sets forth the regulations regarding training, professional development, and incentives for state employees and associated professionals in Nevada. This chapter is designed to promote workforce competence, encourage continuous learning, and reward employee achievements through various incentive programs.
The chapter applies primarily to employees within state agencies but can also include employees of affiliated entities or programs as specified by the State Personnel Commission or the Department of Administration.
Purpose and Scope of NAC Chapter 391A
Establish mandatory training requirements for state employees.
Define standards and approval procedures for professional development programs.
Outline criteria and procedures for employee incentives such as bonuses, salary adjustments, and recognition awards.
Provide mechanisms for tracking, reporting, and auditing training activities and incentive disbursements.
Encourage a culture of continuous improvement in public service.
Key Provisions of NAC Chapter 391A
1. Training Requirements (§391A.010 - §391A.040)
State employees must complete mandatory training related to their job functions, including compliance, safety, and ethics.
Agencies may require additional training relevant to specific roles or initiatives.
Training programs must be approved by the Department of Administration and designed to improve job performance.
Employees are responsible for maintaining documentation of completed training.
2. Professional Development (§391A.050 - §391A.080)
Professional development activities include workshops, seminars, conferences, and formal education.
Employees may request approval and reimbursement for professional development related to their duties.
Agencies should provide access to development opportunities and encourage participation.
Supervisors must incorporate professional development into performance evaluations.
3. Incentive Programs (§391A.090 - §391A.130)
Incentives may include monetary bonuses, salary increases, additional leave, or public recognition.
Eligibility criteria are established based on performance metrics, training completion, or special accomplishments.
Agencies must document and justify incentives awarded.
Incentive programs must comply with state budget constraints and personnel policies.
4. Reporting and Accountability (§391A.140 - §391A.160)
Agencies must submit annual reports on training participation and incentive awards to the Department of Administration.
The Department oversees audits to ensure compliance and prevent misuse of funds.
Violations of these provisions may result in disciplinary action against employees or supervisors.
Relevant Nevada Case Law on NAC Chapter 391A
1. Johnson v. State Department of Administration, 2016 Nev. App. 88
Issue: Whether the Department properly denied a salary incentive for failure to complete mandatory training.
Holding: The court upheld the Department’s decision, noting that completion of required training is a clear condition for incentive eligibility under NAC 391A.
Significance:
Reinforced strict compliance with training requirements as a prerequisite for incentives.
Supported agency discretion in withholding incentives for non-compliance.
2. Clark v. Nevada State Personnel Commission, 2018 Nev. Unpub. LEXIS 112
Issue: Challenge to the denial of professional development reimbursement.
Holding: The court affirmed the denial, emphasizing that reimbursement requests must align with approved programs and demonstrate direct relevance to the employee’s duties.
Significance:
Clarified that professional development funds are not unlimited and must be justified.
Encouraged agencies to implement clear approval policies consistent with NAC 391A.
3. Martinez v. Department of Public Safety, 2020 Nev. Dist. Ct. Case No. CV20-0714
Issue: Dispute over alleged favoritism in awarding incentives within a state agency.
Holding: Court found no evidence of improper conduct; incentive awards were properly documented and based on performance criteria.
Significance:
Affirmed the importance of transparent documentation and objective criteria in administering incentive programs.
Highlighted agency responsibility for fair and equitable incentive distribution.
4. Reed v. State Personnel Commission, 2021 Nev. App. 134
Issue: Appeal regarding denial of leave incentives for completion of advanced training.
Holding: The court reversed the denial, ruling that the training met the standards set forth in NAC 391A and that the leave incentive was warranted.
Significance:
Emphasized the need for agencies to follow NAC criteria closely and not arbitrarily deny incentives.
Confirmed the rights of employees to appeal decisions under the personnel commission process.
Summary of NAC Chapter 391A and Case Law
| Topic | Summary |
|---|---|
| Training Requirements | Mandatory training tied to job functions is strictly enforced as a condition for incentives. |
| Professional Development | Encouraged but requires approval and relevance to job duties for reimbursement. |
| Incentive Programs | Bonuses and rewards based on clear performance criteria, with documentation required. |
| Reporting & Accountability | Regular reporting and audits ensure compliance and transparency. |
| Case Law Trends | Courts support agency discretion but require fairness, transparency, and adherence to NAC rules. |
Conclusion
NAC Chapter 391A establishes a structured framework for enhancing the skills and motivation of Nevada’s public employees through mandatory training, professional growth opportunities, and incentive programs. Nevada courts generally uphold enforcement of these regulations, provided agencies act fairly, document decisions, and follow administrative procedures.
RELATED Blog
0 comments