Rights Test and Essence of Rights Test
Rights Test and Essence of Rights Test in Indian Constitutional Law
1. Introduction
The Rights Test and Essence of Rights Test are judicial principles developed by the Indian Supreme Court to determine whether a law or state action violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, especially under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and other fundamental rights.
2. What is the Rights Test?
The Rights Test is a method used by courts to check whether a particular law or governmental action infringes upon a fundamental right.
It involves an examination of whether the law or action directly or indirectly deprives a person of their fundamental right.
If a law limits, restricts, or takes away any part of a fundamental right without satisfying the constitutional requirements (like being reasonable or within permitted restrictions), it fails the Rights Test.
The test asks: Does this law violate or abridge any fundamental right?
Key aspects:
It focuses on the existence and scope of the fundamental right.
It assesses the extent and nature of infringement.
If the infringement is justified by a valid restriction under the Constitution, the law may still be valid.
3. What is the Essence of Rights Test?
The Essence of Rights Test is a principle used by courts to protect the core or essential elements of a fundamental right from being destroyed or diluted by legislation.
The essence or core of a fundamental right cannot be taken away or destroyed, even if the law aims to regulate or restrict.
Even if the State has the power to impose reasonable restrictions, it cannot destroy the very heart of the right.
The test ensures that the fundamental rights retain their meaningful content.
Key features:
It protects the "essential core" of the right.
It limits the scope of permissible restrictions.
Even if a law is framed as a regulation, if it deprives the right's essence, it will be struck down.
4. Relation Between the Two Tests
The Rights Test identifies whether a right has been infringed.
The Essence of Rights Test checks whether the infringement has gone so far as to destroy the essential core of that right.
Together, these tests help courts balance State interests and individual rights.
5. Important Case Laws
A. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
The Supreme Court laid down the basic structure doctrine.
While dealing with amendments restricting fundamental rights, the Court emphasized that the basic or essential features of fundamental rights cannot be abrogated.
This case is considered the origin of the Essence of Rights Test.
The Court said the State can amend laws and even rights but cannot destroy the “basic structure” or “essential features”.
B. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
The Court expanded the scope of Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty).
It held that any law affecting personal liberty must pass the test of reasonableness and procedural fairness.
The case applies the Rights Test to ensure no arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
The Court emphasized that fundamental rights cannot be curtailed except by “procedure established by law” which must be fair, just, and reasonable.
C. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980)
The Court struck down constitutional amendments that destroyed the balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
It held that the essence of fundamental rights cannot be destroyed even by a constitutional amendment.
The Essence of Rights Test was applied to maintain the supremacy of fundamental rights.
D. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) (Right to Privacy Case)
The Supreme Court declared the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21.
The Court applied the Essence of Rights Test to protect the core of the right to privacy against unreasonable State intrusion.
It stressed that any State action limiting privacy must not destroy the core meaning of the right.
6. Illustration of the Tests
| Test | Focus | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Rights Test | Whether a fundamental right is infringed | Law restricting freedom of speech without valid reason |
| Essence of Rights Test | Whether the core or essential part of the right is destroyed | Law that completely bans all forms of speech, thus destroying freedom of speech |
7. Why Are These Tests Important?
They prevent the State from enacting laws that completely nullify fundamental rights.
They provide a framework for judicial review to safeguard constitutional rights.
They uphold the spirit of the Constitution by balancing individual freedoms and societal needs.
They ensure constitutional morality in the exercise of state power.
8. Conclusion
The Rights Test and Essence of Rights Test are crucial tools used by the Indian judiciary to protect the sanctity of fundamental rights.
The Rights Test examines if a law or action restricts or infringes fundamental rights.
The Essence of Rights Test ensures that the essential core of these rights is not destroyed.
Together, they uphold the constitutional guarantee of fundamental rights, making sure that laws do not undermine the basic freedoms guaranteed to every citizen.
RELATED Blog
0 comments