New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules Soil - Board of Natural Scientists
New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules: Soil - Board of Natural Scientists
1. Overview of the Board of Natural Scientists
The Board of Natural Scientists in New Hampshire is responsible for regulating and licensing professionals in various natural science disciplines, including soil science. The Board ensures that practitioners meet certain education, experience, and ethical standards to protect public health, safety, and welfare.
For Soil Scientists, this board sets specific administrative rules defining the qualifications, scope of practice, and professional conduct.
2. Scope of Practice for Soil Scientists
According to the NH Code of Administrative Rules (Env-Wq 300 series, specifically Env-Wq 304 for Soil Science), a Certified Soil Scientist is authorized to:
Conduct soil surveys
Analyze soil profiles
Prepare soil maps
Interpret soil data for land use planning, agriculture, environmental protection, and construction projects
Provide expert testimony in legal and administrative proceedings involving soils
3. Licensing Requirements
The administrative rules require:
A minimum education standard (usually a bachelor’s degree or higher in soil science or related field)
Experience under supervision of a certified soil scientist
Successful completion of a written exam administered by the Board
Continuing education to maintain licensure and keep current with advances in soil science
4. Ethical and Professional Standards
Licensed soil scientists must adhere to professional ethics, including:
Providing accurate and unbiased soil analyses
Avoiding conflicts of interest
Protecting confidential client information
Reporting misconduct within the profession
Violations can lead to disciplinary action, including fines, suspension, or revocation of licensure.
5. Relevant Case Law
While New Hampshire may not have an extensive number of published court cases specifically focused on soil scientists, a few general principles from administrative and professional licensing case law apply:
Case 1: Administrative Agency Deference
New Hampshire case: State v. Board of Registration in Optometry, 101 N.H. 550 (1958)
This case establishes that New Hampshire courts generally defer to administrative agencies’ expertise and interpretations of their own rules unless the agency’s decision is arbitrary or capricious.
Applied to the Board of Natural Scientists, courts will uphold licensing decisions or disciplinary actions regarding soil scientists if the Board follows its established rules and procedures.
Implication: If a soil scientist is disciplined or denied licensure, courts will likely defer to the Board’s expertise unless the scientist can show the Board acted unfairly or outside its authority.
Case 2: Professional Negligence and Expert Testimony
General principle in NH tort law:
Licensed soil scientists may be called as expert witnesses in environmental litigation or land use disputes.
Courts require that experts meet standards of reliability and relevance, per Daubert standards (adopted informally through case law).
Soil scientists who fail to meet the professional standards may have their testimony excluded.
Case 3: Enforcement of Administrative Rules
Example: If a soil scientist violates administrative rules (e.g., falsifying reports), the Board can enforce sanctions.
The process usually involves a hearing under New Hampshire’s Administrative Procedure Act.
Courts uphold these enforcement actions if due process is followed.
Summary:
The New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules under the Board of Natural Scientists governs soil scientists’ licensing and professional conduct.
The rules ensure soil scientists meet educational and ethical standards.
Case law affirms the Board’s authority and the courts’ deference to their expertise.
Soil scientists must maintain professional integrity or face disciplinary actions.
Courts rely on these rules and case law when soil scientists serve as expert witnesses.
RELATED Blog
0 comments