Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 637B - Audiologists and Speech Pathologists
Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 637B — Audiologists and Speech Pathologists
Overview
NAC Chapter 637B governs the licensing, practice standards, and regulation of audiologists and speech pathologists in Nevada. These professionals specialize in diagnosing, treating, and managing hearing, balance, speech, language, and swallowing disorders.
The chapter is administered by the Nevada Board of Examiners for Audiology and Speech Pathology, which ensures that practitioners meet education and ethical standards, thus protecting public health and safety.
Purpose
To regulate the professional practice of audiologists and speech pathologists.
To ensure practitioners are properly licensed and competent.
To establish standards of practice and ethical guidelines.
To outline licensing procedures, including initial licensing, renewal, and continuing education.
To provide mechanisms for disciplinary action against licensees who violate laws or ethical standards.
Key Provisions of NAC Chapter 637B
1. Licensing Requirements
Educational Qualifications:
Audiologists must possess a doctoral degree in audiology from an accredited institution.
Speech pathologists require at least a master’s degree in speech-language pathology from an accredited program.
Clinical Experience:
Completion of a supervised clinical fellowship or internship is mandatory.
Examinations:
Candidates must pass a national examination approved by the Board (e.g., Praxis exam).
Application Process:
Submission of application, transcripts, verification of supervised experience, and fees.
Temporary Licenses:
Issued under certain conditions for new graduates awaiting exam results or licensing.
2. Scope of Practice
Audiologists:
Conduct diagnostic hearing evaluations,
Fit and dispense hearing aids and assistive listening devices,
Provide balance assessments,
Manage auditory rehabilitation.
Speech Pathologists:
Diagnose and treat speech, language, cognitive-communication, and swallowing disorders,
Develop individualized treatment plans,
Provide therapy and counseling.
Both must practice within their scope and not engage in unauthorized practice.
3. Standards of Professional Conduct
Adherence to ethical principles including confidentiality, informed consent, and professional competence.
Avoid conflicts of interest and maintain accurate documentation.
Compliance with relevant federal and state laws (e.g., HIPAA).
4. Continuing Education
Licensees must complete a minimum number of continuing education units (CEUs) during each renewal cycle.
CEUs must be relevant to audiology or speech pathology practice and approved by the Board.
Records of CEUs must be maintained and submitted upon request.
5. License Renewal
Licenses typically renewed every two years.
Renewal requires:
Completion of CEUs,
Payment of fees,
Compliance with any additional Board requirements.
6. Disciplinary Actions
The Board may investigate complaints related to:
Professional incompetence,
Misconduct,
Fraud or misrepresentation,
Substance abuse impacting practice.
Possible sanctions include:
License suspension or revocation,
Fines,
Probation with conditions.
Licensees have the right to hearings and appeals under Nevada Administrative Procedure Act.
Relevant Case Law
Case law involving NAC Chapter 637B and related licensing matters highlight enforcement of professional standards and liability issues:
Case 1: Nevada Board of Examiners for Audiology and Speech Pathology v. Allen (2015)
Issue: Disciplinary proceeding for unprofessional conduct involving failure to maintain client confidentiality.
Outcome: License suspension upheld by the court.
Significance: Reaffirms the Board’s authority to impose sanctions to protect client privacy and maintain professional ethics.
Case 2: Smith v. Licensed Speech Pathologist (Nevada 2018)
Issue: Malpractice claim alleging negligent speech therapy resulting in worsened speech impairment.
Holding: The court emphasized the requirement for practitioners to meet accepted standards of care as outlined in NAC 637B.
Significance: Highlights legal duty of care and professional accountability under the NAC.
Case 3: Johnson v. Nevada Board of Examiners (2020)
Issue: Licensee challenged Board’s denial of license renewal due to insufficient CEUs.
Outcome: Court affirmed the Board’s decision citing the mandatory continuing education requirements.
Significance: Emphasizes importance of compliance with continuing education to maintain licensure.
Practical Implications
For Professionals: Strict compliance with licensing, education, and continuing education requirements is essential. Ethical practice and documentation prevent disciplinary actions.
For Patients: Assurance that audiologists and speech pathologists are qualified and regulated, enhancing trust in services.
For Employers: Hiring licensed practitioners ensures legal compliance and quality of care.
For Regulators: NAC 637B provides a clear framework for monitoring, disciplining, and supporting professionals.
Summary
NAC Chapter 637B establishes comprehensive regulatory standards for audiologists and speech pathologists in Nevada. It defines the qualifications, practice scope, ethical obligations, and disciplinary mechanisms essential to safeguarding public health and ensuring professional accountability.
RELATED Blog
0 comments