Rhode Island Code of Regulations Title 515 - Commission for Human Rights
Rhode Island Code of Regulations Title 515
Commission for Human Rights (CHR)
Overview
The Commission for Human Rights is a state agency tasked with enforcing laws against discrimination in areas like employment, housing, public accommodations, and education. Title 515 sets forth the administrative rules guiding the Commission’s operations, including complaint processing, investigation, hearings, and enforcement actions.
Key Functions and Powers of the Commission for Human Rights
Investigation of Complaints: The Commission investigates allegations of discrimination based on protected characteristics such as race, gender, religion, disability, etc.
Mediation and Resolution: Attempts to resolve disputes through mediation or conciliation.
Administrative Hearings: Conducts hearings on discrimination claims when conciliation fails.
Enforcement: Issues orders to cease discriminatory practices and can impose penalties or refer matters for judicial enforcement.
Relevant Legal and Constitutional Principles
Given the CHR’s role in protecting civil rights and enforcing anti-discrimination laws, key constitutional principles and case law govern its procedures and powers.
1. Due Process Rights
When the Commission takes actions that affect an individual's rights or livelihood (such as employment discrimination findings or penalties), it must afford due process.
Due process guarantees:
Notice: Clear communication of charges or allegations.
Hearing: Opportunity to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be heard before an impartial decision-maker.
Reasoned Decision: The Commission must provide findings supported by evidence.
Case Law:
Goldberg v. Kelly (1970): Established the requirement of a fair hearing before deprivation of significant interests.
Mathews v. Eldridge (1976): Developed the balancing test for due process requirements, considering private and governmental interests.
2. Scope of Agency Authority and Judicial Review
The Commission operates under delegated authority to enforce anti-discrimination laws.
Courts review CHR decisions to ensure the Commission acted within its authority and that its decisions are supported by substantial evidence and not arbitrary.
Case Law:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984): Courts defer to reasonable agency interpretations of their rules.
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass’n v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. (1983): Agency decisions must not be arbitrary or capricious.
3. Equal Protection and Anti-Discrimination Principles
The Commission’s work rests on constitutional guarantees of equal protection under the law.
Its enforcement actions must themselves comply with constitutional standards, avoiding discrimination or overreach.
Case Law:
Brown v. Board of Education (1954): A foundational case affirming the principle that racial segregation violates equal protection.
Shelley v. Kraemer (1948): Recognized judicial enforcement of racially restrictive covenants violates constitutional rights.
4. Separation of Powers and Role of the Commission
The Commission functions as an administrative agency within the executive branch.
Its decisions are subject to judicial review but are given deference where appropriate.
The judiciary ensures the Commission acts within constitutional and statutory bounds.
Case Law:
Marbury v. Madison (1803): Courts may invalidate agency actions that conflict with constitutional principles.
Application of These Principles to Title 515
Title 515 ensures the Commission operates fairly and transparently.
Parties alleging discrimination receive notice and the opportunity for a hearing.
The Commission’s findings must be based on a full and fair evaluation of evidence.
If a party contests the Commission’s ruling, courts review for procedural fairness, evidentiary support, and constitutional compliance.
Summary
The Commission for Human Rights enforces anti-discrimination protections under Title 515.
It must follow due process in investigations, hearings, and enforcement.
Its authority is subject to judicial review to prevent arbitrary decisions.
The Commission operates under the constitutional mandate to uphold equal protection.
Key cases like Goldberg, Mathews, Chevron, and Brown illustrate the procedural and substantive standards governing the Commission’s work.
RELATED Blog
0 comments