Doctrine of Implied Powers
Doctrine of Implied Powers
Meaning
The Doctrine of Implied Powers refers to the principle that legislatures (Parliament or State Legislatures) have not only the powers expressly granted by the Constitution but also those powers which are necessary to effectively exercise their expressed powers.
These powers are “implied” rather than explicitly stated in the Constitution.
The doctrine ensures that legislatures can perform their functions effectively even if not every detail is expressly mentioned.
In simple words:
“The legislature has the power to do all things necessary to carry out the powers specifically mentioned in the Constitution.”
Key Features
Implied in Express Powers
The powers are derived from express powers granted in the Constitution, especially Articles 245 and 246.
Essential for Functioning
Implied powers are incidental or ancillary, needed to implement constitutional duties.
Cannot Contradict Constitution
Implied powers cannot go beyond the scope of the Constitution or violate Fundamental Rights.
Flexibility in Legislation
Provides practical flexibility to legislatures to address situations not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
Sources of Implied Powers
Constitutional provisions: Derived from express legislative powers (Article 246).
Necessity for Implementation: Powers necessary for the effective exercise of legislative competence.
Doctrine of Ancillary or Incidental Powers: Allows legislatures to make laws ancillary to express powers.
Important Case Laws
In Re Delhi Laws Act (1967)
The Court held that Parliament or State Legislature could exercise implied powers necessary for the effective functioning of their express powers.
State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala (1957)
Supreme Court recognized implied powers to enforce laws effectively, even if not expressly mentioned in the Constitution.
K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa (1953)
Affirmed that legislatures have powers necessary to implement their express powers, especially in financial and administrative matters.
Difference Between Express and Implied Powers
| Aspect | Express Powers | Implied Powers |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Powers specifically granted by the Constitution | Powers not mentioned but necessary to carry out express powers |
| Source | Constitution (e.g., Articles 245, 246) | Derived from express powers |
| Scope | Limited to what is stated | Extends to all things necessary to exercise express powers effectively |
| Case Example | Article 246 (Legislative Lists) | State of Bombay v. Chamarbaugwala |
Significance
Ensures Effective Governance
Allows legislatures to function effectively, even when the Constitution is silent on minor details.
Avoids Legislative Vacuum
Prevents situations where express powers cannot be exercised due to lack of specific enabling provisions.
Supports Federal Functioning
Helps both Union and States exercise their legislative competence fully within constitutional limits.
Judicial Recognition
Courts have consistently upheld the doctrine, ensuring that implied powers are exercised reasonably and within constitutional bounds.
Conclusion
The Doctrine of Implied Powers is a constitutional principle that empowers legislatures to take all necessary steps to implement their express powers effectively. It balances legislative flexibility with constitutional limits and has been recognized in landmark cases such as State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala (1957) and K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa (1953).
RELATED Blog
0 comments