Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 1725 - Urban and Federal AffairsRules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 1725 - Urban and Federal Affairs
Overview of Title 1725 - Urban and Federal Affairs
Title 1725 was a section of the Tennessee Administrative Code concerning urban development and federal affairs. It was primarily designed to coordinate efforts between local urban projects and federal programs, including grant administration, planning, and urban policy implementation within Tennessee.
However, this title was repealed in 1986. That means the regulations under this title are no longer active or enforceable.
What the Title Covered When Active
Coordination of Urban Programs: The Office of Urban and Federal Affairs was responsible for managing and overseeing urban development projects.
Federal Grant Administration: It coordinated with federal agencies to ensure Tennessee’s compliance and efficient use of federal urban development funds.
Urban Planning Guidance: Provided frameworks and guidelines for local governments to handle urban planning issues.
Why It Was Repealed
By the mid-1980s, Tennessee reorganized its urban development efforts, possibly due to changes in federal policies or state priorities. Public Chapter 575 repealed the entire title in 1986, likely transferring responsibilities to other agencies or departments.
Relevant Case Law Related to Urban and Federal Affairs in Tennessee
Since Title 1725 itself was repealed, there isn’t specific case law directly interpreting these regulations. But we can discuss some important cases related to urban development, federal funding, and state coordination which may be relevant in the broader context:
1. Town of Collierville v. County of Shelby, 967 S.W.2d 339 (Tenn. 1998)
Issue: The case involved a dispute over urban annexation and municipal growth planning.
Significance: It clarified the scope of municipal powers in urban development, emphasizing local government authority in managing growth while considering federal and state laws.
2. Tennessee v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), (various cases in federal courts)
Issue: Disputes over compliance with federal urban development grant conditions.
Significance: Established that Tennessee, like other states, must adhere strictly to federal guidelines to maintain urban development funding, showing the importance of state coordination with federal agencies.
3. City of Memphis v. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, 2007 Tenn. App. LEXIS 678
Issue: Although focused on environmental regulation, this case touches on urban development regulation and how state agencies coordinate with municipalities.
Significance: Demonstrated that state departments involved in urban affairs must comply with administrative procedures and respect local government prerogatives.
General Legal Principles in Urban and Federal Affairs
Federal Preemption: Federal regulations often preempt state rules in urban development when tied to federal funding.
State Sovereignty: States retain significant powers to regulate urban planning, but coordination with federal programs is necessary.
Administrative Law: State agencies must follow procedural fairness when enforcing urban development regulations.
Grant Compliance: Failure to comply with federal grant rules can result in funding loss, impacting urban projects.
Summary
Title 1725 was the formal regulatory structure for urban and federal affairs in Tennessee but was repealed in 1986.
No current regulations or case law specifically interpret Title 1725 itself.
Broader case law involving urban development, municipal powers, and federal funding compliance in Tennessee is highly relevant to understanding the principles behind the title.
RELATED Blog
0 comments