North Dakota Administrative Code Title 71 - Retirement Board
Overview: North Dakota Administrative Code Title 71 – Retirement Board
The North Dakota Retirement Board is the administrative entity responsible for overseeing the state's public retirement systems. This board manages retirement plans for public employees, ensuring proper administration of benefits, contributions, and investments under North Dakota law.
Purpose of Title 71 – Retirement Board
The administrative code under Title 71 sets forth the rules governing the:
Management and administration of retirement funds.
Fiduciary duties of board members.
Procedures for benefit determination and payment.
Investment policies of retirement funds.
Member eligibility and contribution requirements.
Dispute resolution mechanisms related to retirement benefits.
The code aims to provide clear guidelines for protecting the interests of public employees and beneficiaries while maintaining the financial integrity of retirement systems.
Structure and Composition
The Retirement Board typically consists of appointed members who may include government officials, representatives of public employees, and investment experts.
Members serve for defined terms and are charged with fiduciary responsibility.
The board holds regular meetings as outlined in the code and maintains transparency through reporting requirements.
Key Provisions in Title 71 – Retirement Board
1. Board Powers and Duties
Administer retirement plans according to state statutes.
Adopt rules and policies necessary for the administration of the retirement system.
Oversee the collection of contributions from employees and employers.
Approve disbursement of retirement benefits.
Manage investment of fund assets prudently.
2. Member Eligibility and Contributions
Defines who is eligible for retirement benefits under various plans.
Specifies contribution rates for members and employers.
Sets rules for enrollment, vesting, and service credit.
3. Benefit Calculations and Payments
Rules for calculating retirement, disability, and survivor benefits.
Procedures for application, approval, and disbursement of benefits.
Options for lump-sum payments, annuities, or deferred benefits.
4. Investment Policies
Guidelines for prudent investment of retirement funds.
Requirements for diversification and risk management.
Reporting on investment performance.
5. Appeals and Dispute Resolution
Processes for members to appeal decisions regarding benefits.
Hearings before the board or designated officers.
Judicial review rights under state law.
Interaction with Case Law
Court cases involving the Retirement Board typically deal with issues such as:
Fiduciary duty and mismanagement claims.
Disputes over benefit eligibility and calculation.
Procedural due process in administrative decisions.
Interpretation of statutes and administrative rules.
Challenges to investment decisions.
1. Fiduciary Duty and Mismanagement
The Retirement Board members have a fiduciary duty to manage funds prudently and in the best interest of beneficiaries.
Courts have held that board members can be held liable if they breach this duty by mismanaging funds or engaging in self-dealing.
However, courts also recognize the discretionary nature of investment decisions, granting some deference unless there is clear evidence of bad faith or gross negligence.
Example concept:
If beneficiaries allege the board invested funds recklessly, causing losses, courts will examine whether the board followed prudent investment standards prevailing at the time.
2. Benefit Eligibility and Calculation Disputes
Members sometimes contest decisions on eligibility or the amount of benefits.
Courts typically defer to the board’s expertise unless the board acted arbitrarily or violated law.
Challenges often involve interpretation of plan language or administrative rules.
Example concept:
A retiree may dispute the denial of a disability benefit, arguing the board misapplied eligibility criteria. Courts review the administrative record to ensure the board’s decision was supported by evidence.
3. Procedural Due Process
When the board denies or reduces benefits, affected members may claim a violation of due process rights.
Courts have required fair notice, opportunity to be heard, and reasoned decisions.
If the board fails to provide these protections, courts may reverse or remand decisions.
4. Interpretation of Statutes and Rules
Disputes over the meaning of provisions in the administrative code or underlying statutes frequently arise.
Courts apply principles of administrative law to interpret ambiguous provisions.
Deference is often given to the board’s reasonable interpretations unless they conflict with statutory language.
5. Challenges to Investment Decisions
Although the board controls investments, lawsuits may arise if members believe investments violate legal or fiduciary standards.
Courts typically apply the business judgment rule, protecting board decisions made in good faith with reasonable diligence.
Exceptions occur when there is evidence of fraud or gross mismanagement.
Summary
North Dakota Administrative Code Title 71 provides the legal framework for the governance and operation of the Retirement Board, focusing on:
Sound management of public retirement funds.
Fair administration of retirement benefits.
Protection of beneficiaries’ rights.
Prudent investment and fiduciary oversight.
Case law involving the Retirement Board centers on fiduciary responsibility, benefit disputes, due process in administrative actions, and statutory interpretation. Courts generally defer to the board’s expertise but ensure legal and procedural compliance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments