The South Carolina Code of Regulations, Chapter 73,
Overview of S.C. Code Regs. Chapter 73 — Law Enforcement Division
Chapter 73 of the South Carolina Regulations sets out various rules under the Law Enforcement Division (SLED), covering many areas relating to criminal justice, weapons, controlled substances, private security, sex offender registry, etc.
The major Articles include:
Implied Consent Test (DUI / chemical tests)
Accident Fatalities — Blood Samples
Criminal Information and Communication (e.g. dissemination of criminal history, registry)
Unlawful Weapons
Uniform Procedures for Handling of Controlled Substances — rules about how evidence of controlled substances is managed, tested, stored, destroyed.
Sex Offender Registry — confidentiality, information dissemination, etc.
Concealable Weapons Permit
Private Security & Private Investigation Businesses — licensing, training, criminal background, operations.
Key Provisions with Practical Consequences
Here are some of the more detailed rules and how they matter:
Storage of Controlled Substance Evidence (§ 73‑130): Requires secure repository, limited access, clear packaging, inventory control, unique identifiers outside packages, avoidance of cross-contamination
Preparation for Destruction of Controlled Substance Evidence (§ 73‑140): After trial, evidentiary items must be sealed, transferred properly using signed documentation, separation of non‑evidence items, two‑person rule for handling, etc.
Dissemination of Criminal History Record Information (§ 73‑23): SLED / CJIS must maintain criminal history system; dissemination allowed to bona fide criminal justice agencies; requires adherence to laws governing collection, storage, retrieval, dissemination.
Private Security / Private Investigation Businesses (Article 9): Rules for licensing, employee character, training, scope, regulatory responsibilities of businesses; regulation of access to criminal databases; penalties for misuse; etc.
Legal Principles & Case‑Law Reasoning (General/Illustrative)
While I couldn’t readily locate specific published case names tied directly to many of these regulatory subsections, the regulatory scheme interacts with principles from administrative law, criminal law, constitutional law. Below are illustrative legal issues and how courts might treat them, based on precedent reasoning in administrative and criminal procedural contexts.
Illustrative/Known Legal Issues
Chain of Custody / Evidence Handling in Controlled Substances Cases
Issue: Whether a criminal conviction based on controlled substance evidence is invalid because the evidence was improperly stored, packaged, or chain of custody was broken (per § 73‑130 or § 73‑140).
Hypothetical Case Reasoning: A defendant argues that the evidence was stored in a facility where unauthorized persons had access, or packages were not clearly marked, or evidence from different cases got mixed. The court would examine the record: was there substantial compliance with § 73‑130's requirements? If violations are minor and did not prejudice the defendant, conviction may be upheld; but if there was a major breach causing doubt about identity or integrity of the evidence, suppression might be required.
Right to Access / Accuracy of Criminal History Information
Issue: An individual claims that SLED disseminated his criminal history with incorrect information, or that unauthorized persons got access, violating § 73‑23.
Hypothetical Case Reasoning: The court reviews whether the dissemination was made “to bona fide criminal justice agencies” as required, and whether the information was accurate and properly maintained. If SLED failed to follow its own rules in verifying or restricting access, the individual may obtain relief—damages or correction of records.
Licensing / Disciplinary Actions for Private Security / Investigators
Issue: A private investigator’s license is denied or revoked because of some prior criminal history or failure to meet character / training requirements under Article 9.
Hypothetical Case Reasoning: The board / agency must ensure that decisions are not arbitrary; that regulation’s provisions are properly applied; notice and an opportunity to be heard must be given; if the regulation allows for discretion, that discretion must be reasonably exercised. The court would uphold the regulation if the licensee fails to meet clear criteria, but might reverse if the enforcement or denial is capricious or violates procedural fairness.
Sex Offender Registry Confidentiality
Issue: A party challenges release of certain registry data or claims information in registry used improperly, arguing violation of § 73‑230 or related disclosure rules.
Hypothetical Case Reasoning: The court would balance public safety interests vs. privacy or due process rights. If release is beyond what regulation or law allows (e.g. to non‑authorized recipients) or lacks proper safeguards, court may restrain or sanction. But if SLED follows regulation for “only authorized agencies” and proper procedures, the challenge will fail.
Key Administrative Law Principles Embodied / Invoked
Procedural due process: Many regulations imply or require notice, hearing, opportunity to respond (e.g. license denial, revocation, evidence destruction).
Substantial evidence standard: In decisions (e.g. discipline, license denial), courts will look for substantial evidence (a legal/record basis) in SLED’s administrative record.
Reasonableness / not arbitrary or capricious: Regulations must be applied in a way that is consistent, fair, and in line with the regulatory text.
Equal protection / non‑discrimination: For example, for those applying for licenses or in access to criminal history information, rules cannot be applied discriminatorily.
Limitations and Gaps
The regulatory rules are detailed in many parts, but enforcement depends on SLED’s capacity and transparency of administrative proceedings.
Specific case law applying these exact regulation sections may be less common or less published; many issues may be resolved in lower courts or administrative tribunals without widely reported published opinions.
Summary
Chapter 73 is a broad and significant regulation set under SLED, covering implied consent for tests, weapons, controlled substances, sex offender registry, private security, etc.
Key provisions govern how evidence is handled, how criminal history records are shared, how private security agencies are licensed, and how registry data is secured.
In practice, these rules matter greatly for criminal defense, law enforcement evidence admissibility, licensing of security firms or individuals, privacy/confidentiality of offender data, and public safety.
Legal challenges tend to revolve around due process, chain of custody, procedural fairness, accuracy, and scope of authority.
RELATED Blog
0 comments