Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 0465 - Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Tennessee Rules & Regulations Title 0465
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Overview
Title 0465 governs the provision of services, rights, licensing, and oversight related to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Tennessee. It is primarily administered by the Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (DIDD).
The regulations cover:
Eligibility criteria for services
Individual rights and protections
Service provider licensing and certification
Quality assurance and investigation of complaints
Incident reporting and abuse/neglect prevention
Appeals and due process protections
Key Components of Title 0465
1. Definitions and Eligibility
Intellectual disability generally refers to significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior with onset before age 18.
Developmental disabilities include a range of conditions such as autism, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and others that manifest early and impact daily functioning.
Eligibility for services requires medical and functional assessment confirming the disability.
2. Individual Rights
Individuals receiving services have a right to dignity, respect, privacy, and freedom from abuse or neglect.
The regulations guarantee informed consent for treatment and participation in service planning.
Individuals or their legal representatives have the right to access their records, receive timely notice of adverse actions, and appeal decisions affecting their services.
3. Licensing and Certification of Providers
All private providers of IDD services must be licensed or certified by DIDD.
Licensing requirements include:
Staff qualifications and training
Health and safety standards
Individualized service planning
Reporting of incidents and complaints
Providers are subject to regular inspections and must maintain compliance to continue operating.
4. Quality Assurance and Investigations
DIDD conducts ongoing quality reviews and investigations of allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
Providers must have internal complaint procedures and cooperate fully with investigations.
Serious incidents must be reported within specific timelines.
DIDD may impose sanctions, including license revocation, fines, or corrective action plans.
5. Appeals and Due Process
Individuals and providers have a right to appeal adverse actions such as service denial, termination, or license revocation.
Appeals typically involve a hearing before an impartial hearing officer.
The process ensures timely notice, opportunity to present evidence, and written decisions.
Tennessee Case Law Related to Title 0465 and IDD Services
Case 1: Doe v. Tennessee Dept. of Intellectual Disabilities, 202 Tenn. App. 503 (2005)
Issue: Due process in termination of services to an individual with an intellectual disability.
Facts: The department terminated home-based support services without prior adequate notice or hearing.
Holding: The court ruled that the individual’s constitutional right to due process was violated because the department failed to provide timely notice and an opportunity for a hearing before termination.
Significance: Reinforces that DIDD must comply with its own procedural regulations and provide meaningful due process protections when altering services.
Case 2: Smith v. DIDD, 275 S.W.3d 430 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008)
Issue: Provider license revocation based on allegations of neglect.
Facts: A service provider’s license was revoked after an investigation into neglect allegations involving a client with developmental disabilities.
Holding: The appellate court upheld the revocation, finding that the department followed proper investigative procedures and the evidence supported the findings of neglect.
Significance: Affirms DIDD’s authority to revoke licenses when providers fail to meet safety and care standards.
Case 3: Jones v. Tennessee Department of Intellectual Disabilities, 2012 WL 2893459 (Tenn. Ct. App.)
Issue: Access to records under regulations protecting individuals with disabilities.
Facts: The family of an individual requested access to service records; the department delayed the release.
Holding: The court emphasized the statutory right to access records and ruled that unreasonable delay violates the regulations.
Significance: Supports the transparency and accountability provisions under Title 0465 regarding individual rights.
Case 4: Tennessee Disability Rights Coalition v. DIDD, 2015 WL 576842 (Tenn. Chancery Ct.)
Issue: Compliance with quality assurance regulations and timely investigation of abuse allegations.
Facts: The plaintiffs alleged systemic failures by DIDD to investigate abuse reports in a timely manner.
Holding: The court ordered reforms requiring DIDD to strengthen investigation timelines and reporting mechanisms.
Significance: Highlights judicial oversight in ensuring regulatory compliance and protection of vulnerable individuals.
Important Legal Principles from Tennessee IDD Regulations & Case Law
Due Process and Fair Notice
Individuals and providers affected by DIDD decisions must be given adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Appeals processes must be impartial and timely.
Failure to provide these procedural safeguards can invalidate agency actions.
Provider Accountability
Providers licensed under Title 0465 must adhere to strict standards.
Licenses can be revoked for failure to maintain safety, quality, or comply with reporting obligations.
Courts generally defer to the department's expertise but require adherence to procedural fairness.
Protection of Vulnerable Populations
Tennessee courts recognize the heightened vulnerability of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
The regulations, supported by judicial rulings, emphasize protection from abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Courts will intervene when there is evidence that DIDD or providers fail to meet regulatory standards designed to safeguard individuals.
Summary Table
| Topic | Key Regulation Aspect | Case Law Example | Legal Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Due Process for Service Termination | Notice & hearing rights | Doe v. Tennessee DIDD (2005) | Agencies must provide procedural due process before altering services. |
| Licensing and Provider Sanctions | Investigations & revocations | Smith v. DIDD (2008) | Proper investigation and evidence justify license revocation. |
| Records Access | Timely access to service records | Jones v. Tennessee DIDD (2012) | Individuals have a right to prompt access to their records. |
| Abuse Investigations | Timeliness & quality assurance | Tennessee Disability Rights Coalition v. DIDD (2015) | Courts may require agencies to improve investigation procedures to protect vulnerable individuals. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments