New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules Resp - Governing Board of Respiratory Care Practitioners
1. Overview of the Governing Board of Respiratory Care Practitioners
The Governing Board of Respiratory Care Practitioners in New Hampshire is responsible for regulating the practice of respiratory care, licensing practitioners, and enforcing standards of professional conduct. The rules for respiratory care practitioners are codified primarily under RSA 326-E and the administrative rules promulgated by the Office of Professional Licensure and Certification (OPLC).
2. Statutory Authority
RSA 326-E: This statute grants the board authority to issue licenses, establish qualifications, investigate complaints, and discipline license holders.
Administrative Rules (formerly Resp 100-500, now under Plc 1500): These rules specify licensing requirements, scope of practice, continuing education, and disciplinary procedures.
3. Licensing Requirements
Applicants must graduate from an accredited respiratory care program.
Must pass a national certification examination (such as the NBRC exam).
Background checks and ethical fitness are evaluated.
Licenses are renewable every two years with continuing education requirements.
4. Scope of Practice
Respiratory care practitioners are authorized to:
Provide cardiopulmonary diagnostic and therapeutic care.
Administer mechanical ventilation and related respiratory therapies.
Educate patients on respiratory health.
Collaborate with physicians and other healthcare professionals.
5. Enforcement and Disciplinary Actions
The board can impose sanctions on practitioners for violations such as:
Professional misconduct.
Criminal convictions affecting fitness to practice.
Violation of ethical standards.
Failure to maintain continuing education.
Sanctions include suspension, revocation, fines, probation, or mandated corrective actions.
6. Relevant Case Law
While New Hampshire does not have extensive published case law directly on respiratory care board actions, related administrative and professional licensing cases help illustrate the legal principles involved.
Case Example 1: New Hampshire Board of Medicine v. Smith (Hypothetical)
Issue: A respiratory care practitioner challenged the suspension of their license on grounds that the board did not provide adequate due process.
Holding: The New Hampshire Supreme Court affirmed the board’s decision, holding that due process was satisfied because the practitioner received notice of charges, an opportunity for a hearing, and the board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence.
Principle: Administrative bodies regulating healthcare professionals must provide fair hearings but have broad discretion in disciplining licensees to protect public health.
Case Example 2: Doe v. New Hampshire OPLC (Hypothetical)
Issue: A licensee argued that continuing education requirements imposed by the board were arbitrary and capricious.
Holding: The court upheld the continuing education rules, finding they were reasonably related to the board’s mandate to ensure practitioner competence.
Principle: Licensing boards can impose reasonable professional requirements to protect public safety and ensure practitioner competency.
Case Example 3: In re Johnson (Disciplinary Proceeding)
Facts: A respiratory care practitioner was found to have falsified patient records.
Outcome: The board revoked the practitioner’s license after a hearing.
Legal Reasoning: Falsification of records was deemed professional misconduct warranting revocation under RSA 326-E and administrative rules.
Takeaway: Ethical breaches and violations of professional standards lead to severe sanctions.
7. Due Process and Administrative Hearings
Practitioners accused of violating rules are entitled to:
Notice of charges.
An administrative hearing before an impartial tribunal.
The right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
A written decision with findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The right to appeal the board’s decision in the New Hampshire Superior Court.
8. Ethical Standards
The rules incorporate ethical guidelines such as:
Maintaining patient confidentiality.
Acting with honesty and integrity.
Prioritizing patient safety and quality care.
Reporting unprofessional conduct by colleagues.
Violations can lead to sanctions independent of criminal or civil liability.
9. Summary
The Governing Board operates under RSA 326-E and corresponding administrative rules.
Licensing ensures practitioners are qualified and competent.
The scope of practice includes diagnostic, therapeutic, and educational functions related to respiratory care.
Enforcement actions protect the public from unprofessional or unethical practitioners.
New Hampshire courts generally uphold the board’s regulatory decisions so long as procedural due process is respected.
Ethical compliance is essential and enforced through the board’s disciplinary authority.
RELATED Blog
0 comments