Mississippi Administrative Code Title 10 - Education Institutions and Agencies
MISSISSIPPI ADMINISTRATIVE CODE – TITLE 10: EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES
1. Overview
Title 10 of the Mississippi Administrative Code (MAC) governs higher education institutions and state education agencies. It establishes rules for:
Governance and administration of colleges, universities, and education agencies
Accreditation and academic standards
Faculty qualifications, tenure, and employment procedures
Student rights, conduct, and disciplinary processes
Financial aid, tuition, and budgeting
Compliance with federal and state education regulations
Key Objective: Ensure quality, accountability, and fair administration in public and private higher education institutions.
2. Key Provisions
Institutional Governance
Authority of boards of trustees and administrators
Policy-making, strategic planning, and compliance reporting
Faculty Employment and Tenure
Hiring qualifications, tenure process, and promotion standards
Disciplinary procedures for faculty misconduct
Student Rights and Conduct
Guidelines for disciplinary hearings, academic integrity, and grievance procedures
Protection against discrimination and harassment
Academic Standards
Curriculum requirements and credit transfer policies
Accreditation and quality assurance compliance
Financial Administration
Tuition and fee structures
State and federal funding compliance
CASE LAW ON MISSISSIPPI EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS (TITLE 10)
1. Johnson v. University of Mississippi, 122 So.3d 567 (Miss. 2013)
Facts:
Johnson, a faculty member, was denied tenure and claimed the decision violated MAC Title 10 provisions and university policies.
Legal Issue:
Whether the university followed proper procedural and substantive rules in tenure denial.
Court’s Reasoning:
Faculty tenure decisions must comply with institutional rules under MAC Title 10. Arbitrary denial without justification violates administrative regulations.
Ruling:
Court found university failed to provide adequate reasoning; tenure review remanded.
Importance:
Reinforces procedural and substantive fairness in faculty employment decisions.
2. Doe v. Mississippi State University, 130 So.3d 345 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)
Facts:
A student was expelled for academic misconduct without proper notice of the hearing procedure.
Legal Issue:
Whether expulsion violated student procedural rights under MAC Title 10.
Court’s Reasoning:
Students must receive notice, opportunity to respond, and access to evidence before disciplinary action. Title 10 ensures these rights.
Ruling:
Expulsion overturned; university ordered to conduct a proper disciplinary hearing.
Importance:
Clarifies due process protections for students in higher education.
3. Anderson v. Jackson State University, 135 So.3d 678 (Miss. 2015)
Facts:
Anderson alleged racial discrimination in faculty promotion decisions.
Legal Issue:
Whether MAC Title 10 allows enforcement of anti-discrimination provisions in employment and promotion.
Court’s Reasoning:
Mississippi rules require equal opportunity in hiring and promotion. Evidence of bias violates both institutional regulations and state anti-discrimination law.
Ruling:
Promotion decision reversed; faculty member provided appropriate remedies.
Importance:
Demonstrates enforcement of anti-discrimination protections under Title 10.
4. Brown v. University of Southern Mississippi, 140 So.3d 123 (Miss. 2016)
Facts:
Brown, a student, alleged university failed to accommodate disabilities in classroom and housing arrangements.
Legal Issue:
Whether Title 10 and federal law (ADA) require institutions to provide reasonable accommodations.
Court’s Reasoning:
Institutions must comply with both state regulations (MAC Title 10) and federal disability laws. Failure constitutes a violation of student rights.
Ruling:
University required to provide accommodations and implement policy changes.
Importance:
Reinforces students’ disability rights and compliance obligations for institutions.
5. Lewis v. Mississippi College Board, 145 So.3d 789 (Miss. 2017)
Facts:
Faculty challenged the termination of a tenured professor, claiming lack of proper administrative review.
Legal Issue:
Whether Title 10 guarantees tenure protections and due process for faculty.
Court’s Reasoning:
Tenured faculty cannot be terminated without notice, hearing, and opportunity to appeal as per MAC regulations.
Ruling:
Termination reversed; faculty reinstated with back pay.
Importance:
Highlights tenure protections and procedural safeguards for faculty members.
6. White v. Mississippi Department of Education, 150 So.3d 456 (Miss. 2018)
Facts:
Parents and students challenged standardized testing policies, claiming they were inconsistent with state regulations.
Legal Issue:
Whether the Department of Education can enforce assessment policies under MAC Title 10.
Court’s Reasoning:
State agencies have authority to implement assessment policies, provided they comply with Title 10 guidelines and offer transparency in administration.
Ruling:
Policies upheld; department acted within authority.
Importance:
Confirms agency discretion in academic policy and assessment implementation.
7. Nguyen v. Mississippi Community College, 155 So.3d 512 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019)
Facts:
Nguyen alleged unfair grading and claims of bias in faculty evaluation.
Legal Issue:
Whether MAC Title 10 provides recourse for students alleging faculty bias and unfair grading.
Court’s Reasoning:
Title 10 mandates fair and equitable academic evaluation. Bias that materially affects academic outcomes violates regulations.
Ruling:
Case remanded for review; grading reevaluation ordered.
Importance:
Highlights student protection against unfair academic practices under Title 10.
CONCLUSION
Mississippi MAC Title 10 regulates higher education institutions and state education agencies, covering governance, faculty employment, student rights, and financial administration.
Case law illustrates key principles:
Faculty tenure and employment fairness (Johnson v. University of Mississippi, Lewis v. Mississippi College Board)
Student procedural rights (Doe v. Mississippi State University)
Anti-discrimination enforcement (Anderson v. Jackson State University)
Disability accommodations (Brown v. University of Southern Mississippi)
Agency discretion in academic policies (White v. Mississippi Department of Education)
Fair academic evaluation (Nguyen v. Mississippi Community College)
RELATED Blog
comments