Code of Massachusetts Regulations 974 CMR - DEVENS ENTERPRISE COMMISSION
1. Overview of the Michigan Administrative Code – Department of Talent and Economic Development
The Michigan Department of Talent and Economic Development (TED) is a state agency that focuses on:
Workforce development and training
Job creation and economic growth
Support for businesses and entrepreneurs
Employment programs and talent retention
The Michigan Administrative Code (MAC) contains the rules and regulations that implement statutory authority given to TED. These rules provide:
Procedures for workforce and training programs
Grant and funding guidelines
Business assistance programs
Compliance, reporting, and enforcement rules
TED operates under statutory authority in Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL), including workforce development laws, talent retention initiatives, and economic development statutes. The MAC codifies these rules so that programs operate consistently and fairly.
2. Key Areas of Michigan Administrative Code for TED
A. Workforce Development Programs
Rules govern eligibility for job training grants, internship programs, and skill-building initiatives.
Procedures include application, selection, and reporting requirements for employers and participants.
B. Business Incentives and Grants
TED administers incentive programs for business expansion and relocation.
MAC specifies eligibility, application procedures, and compliance reporting.
C. Talent Retention Initiatives
Rules define programs for retaining Michigan talent, including student loan repayment assistance, job placement programs, and career development services.
D. Compliance and Reporting
TED and participating businesses must comply with funding rules, audits, and program reporting.
Administrative penalties can be imposed for non-compliance.
E. Public Access and Transparency
Programs must provide information to the public about services and eligibility requirements.
MAC sets minimum standards for documentation, program evaluation, and transparency.
3. Case Examples / Applications
Administrative decisions involving TED programs often involve appeals, compliance audits, or disputes regarding eligibility for grants or programs. Here are illustrative examples:
Case 1: Workforce Training Grant Dispute
Facts:
A company applied for a workforce development grant to train employees in advanced manufacturing. The TED office denied the grant, citing incomplete documentation.
Appeal:
The company appealed under administrative procedures.
TED reviewed the submission and found that some required documentation could be supplemented.
Outcome:
Grant was approved after the company provided the missing documentation.
Significance:
Demonstrates the importance of following procedural rules under the Michigan Administrative Code.
Administrative appeals can reverse denials if deficiencies are remedied.
Case 2: Talent Retention Program Eligibility
Facts:
A graduate applied for student loan repayment assistance under TED’s talent retention program. TED initially denied the claim because the graduate had not met the required employment duration.
Decision:
Administrative review confirmed the denial, as MAC rules clearly defined eligibility criteria.
Significance:
Shows that eligibility requirements must be strictly met.
TED’s rules are enforceable and binding unless successfully appealed.
Case 3: Economic Development Incentive Compliance
Facts:
A business received a TED incentive for creating new jobs but later failed to meet job creation targets.
Action:
TED conducted a compliance review.
The business was required to repay part of the incentive according to MAC regulations.
Significance:
Illustrates TED’s authority to enforce compliance and recapture funds if program rules are violated.
Case 4: Dispute Over Program Funding Allocation
Facts:
Two organizations applied for the same workforce development funds. One organization claimed that TED misapplied scoring rules.
Decision:
Administrative hearing found that TED followed the scoring criteria outlined in MAC.
The funding decision was upheld.
Significance:
Shows TED’s funding rules are binding, but applicants can request administrative review to ensure transparency and fairness.
Case 5: Appeals for Misapplication of Program Rules
Facts:
An employer appealed TED’s decision denying participation in a job placement program because they argued the MAC rules were applied incorrectly.
Outcome:
Administrative law judge reviewed the evidence and concluded that TED acted within the scope of its regulatory authority.
The denial was upheld.
Significance:
Confirms that TED has discretion in interpreting program rules, as long as it follows procedures and statutory authority.
4. Key Takeaways
Administrative Rules Are Binding: TED must follow the procedures codified in the MAC for grants, workforce programs, and incentives.
Eligibility Must Be Strictly Met: Programs often have detailed criteria; failure to meet them can result in denial.
Administrative Appeals Are Available: Applicants can request reviews or hearings if they believe rules were misapplied.
Compliance and Reporting Are Critical: TED enforces reporting requirements and can recapture funds for non-compliance.
Transparency and Documentation: The rules ensure that both the public and applicants have clear expectations for programs.
RELATED Blog
comments