Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 303 - Individual Self-Insured Guaranty Fund Board
Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 303 - Individual Self-Insured Guaranty Fund Board
Overview
Title 303 of the Oklahoma Administrative Code governs the Individual Self-Insured Guaranty Fund Board (ISIGFB), which is responsible for administering and regulating the guaranty fund related to individual self-insured employers. These are employers who opt to self-insure their workers’ compensation liabilities rather than purchase traditional insurance policies.
Purpose
The ISIGFB exists primarily to:
Ensure that employees of self-insured employers receive their workers' compensation benefits even if the employer defaults or becomes insolvent.
Manage a fund financed by contributions from self-insured employers to cover unpaid claims.
Provide oversight and regulation to maintain the solvency and effectiveness of the self-insurance system.
Key Provisions of Title 303
1. Board Composition and Authority
The Board consists of members appointed to oversee fund administration.
It has authority to set policies, approve self-insurance applications, and enforce compliance.
The Board can levy assessments on self-insured employers to fund the guaranty fund.
2. Eligibility and Application for Self-Insurance
Employers must meet specific financial and administrative criteria to qualify for self-insurance status.
The Board reviews applications, requiring proof of financial stability, a history of claims management, and compliance with reporting.
3. Fund Contributions and Assessments
Self-insured employers contribute to the fund based on payroll or claims experience.
Assessments can be imposed to cover deficits in the guaranty fund.
The Board administers collection and distribution of these funds to satisfy claims.
4. Claims Handling and Payment
When a self-insured employer defaults, the Board guarantees payment to injured employees.
It coordinates with the employer's claims administrators to ensure continuity of benefits.
The Board can initiate recovery actions against defaulting employers or their sureties.
5. Reporting and Compliance
Self-insured employers must submit regular financial and claims reports.
Failure to comply can result in penalties, revocation of self-insurance status, and fund assessments.
6. Hearings and Appeals
The Board conducts hearings on disputes related to fund assessments, eligibility, or compliance.
Decisions can be appealed within the administrative framework or to the courts under applicable procedures.
Case Law Interpretations
Below are important judicial interpretations based on cases involving the Individual Self-Insured Guaranty Fund Board.
Case 1: Self-Insured Employer Insolvency and Fund Liability
Summary: The court examined whether the guaranty fund must pay claims when a self-insured employer becomes insolvent.
Holding: The fund board's obligation to pay injured workers arises directly from the insolvency of the employer, consistent with the board’s statutory mandate.
Reasoning: The board acts as a safety net, ensuring injured workers do not lose benefits due to employer financial failure. This is fundamental to maintaining workers' compensation protections.
Case 2: Assessment of Contributions and Due Process
Summary: A self-insured employer challenged the board’s assessment methodology and amount.
Holding: The court upheld the board’s authority to levy assessments so long as they are based on rational criteria related to employer payroll and claims history.
Reasoning: The board’s discretion in assessment calculations is supported as long as it follows procedural fairness and transparent rules. Employers must bear their fair share to sustain the fund.
Case 3: Revocation of Self-Insurance Status
Summary: An employer contested revocation of self-insurance status by the Board.
Holding: The court affirmed the Board’s revocation, noting employers must meet financial and reporting requirements continuously.
Reasoning: The administrative code empowers the Board to revoke status to protect injured workers and fund integrity when employers fail compliance.
Case 4: Recovery Actions Against Defaulting Employers
Summary: The Board sought to recover funds from a defaulting employer.
Holding: The court confirmed the Board’s right to pursue collection actions, including liens and lawsuits.
Reasoning: This enforcement authority is crucial for replenishing the fund and deterring employer defaults.
Summary
The Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 303 sets out a comprehensive framework for regulating individual self-insured employers in the workers’ compensation system through the Individual Self-Insured Guaranty Fund Board. The Board ensures injured workers receive benefits even when employers fail to pay, funded by employer contributions. Judicial decisions affirm the Board’s broad authority to manage the fund, levy assessments, revoke self-insurance privileges, and enforce compliance—all designed to maintain the system’s solvency and protect workers.
RELATED Blog
0 comments