Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 1725 - Urban and Federal Affairs
Overview of Tennessee Rules & Regulations Title 1725 – Urban and Federal Affairs
Title 1725 encompasses the administrative rules and regulations related to urban planning, development, and coordination of federal programs within the state of Tennessee. The regulations are promulgated by the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development (ECD) or related urban planning authorities. The goal is to promote effective urban development, coordinate federal grants and programs, and ensure compliance with both state and federal regulations related to urban and community affairs.
Purpose and Scope
The rules under Title 1725 primarily focus on:
Urban planning and zoning compliance
Coordination and administration of federal funding programs (such as HUD grants)
Community development initiatives
Reporting and auditing requirements for urban projects
Intergovernmental cooperation between state, local, and federal agencies
This Title facilitates urban growth management and ensures federal funds are properly allocated and used in compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements.
Key Provisions and Content
1. Urban Development Planning
Guidelines for local governments to prepare urban development plans consistent with state goals.
Requirements for public participation and transparency in urban planning.
Criteria for approval and amendment of comprehensive plans and zoning regulations.
2. Federal Program Coordination
Procedures for applying for, receiving, and managing federal grants such as Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and other HUD funds.
Compliance with federal requirements, including environmental reviews and equal opportunity provisions.
Reporting requirements on expenditure and progress of federally funded projects.
3. Compliance and Monitoring
Rules on monitoring the use of funds and evaluating program effectiveness.
Auditing procedures to ensure funds are used for their intended purposes.
Corrective actions for non-compliance or misuse of funds.
4. Intergovernmental Collaboration
Framework for cooperation between local governments, state agencies, and federal entities.
Sharing of data and resources to improve urban development outcomes.
Conflict resolution procedures for overlapping jurisdictions or funding.
Relevant Case Law Illustrating Application
Although regulations under Title 1725 are mostly administrative and programmatic, some court decisions have addressed disputes involving urban planning and federal funding coordination in Tennessee.
1. City of Memphis v. Tennessee Department of Economic & Community Development, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 678 (2014)
Facts: The City of Memphis challenged the denial of a federal grant by the state agency due to alleged non-compliance with urban development plans.
Issue: Whether the state properly applied Title 1725 regulations in denying funding.
Holding: The court upheld the state’s decision, finding that the denial was based on clear statutory and regulatory criteria designed to ensure proper use of federal funds.
Significance: Reinforces the state's authority under Title 1725 to enforce compliance with urban planning standards tied to federal funding.
2. Doe v. County of Davidson, 2018 Tenn. Cir. LEXIS 342 (2018)
Facts: A property owner contested zoning changes approved under a federally coordinated urban development plan.
Issue: Whether the urban planning process complied with Title 1725's public participation and transparency requirements.
Holding: The court found procedural irregularities and ordered the local government to revisit the zoning changes with proper public input.
Significance: Emphasizes the requirement for public participation under Title 1725 and protects citizens' rights in urban planning decisions.
3. Tennessee Housing Development Agency v. Smith, 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 254 (2010)
Facts: Dispute over misallocation of federal housing funds administered under Title 1725 regulations.
Issue: Whether the agency complied with federal and state monitoring and auditing requirements.
Holding: The court ruled that failure to adhere to reporting and monitoring procedures constituted grounds for sanctions and repayment of misused funds.
Significance: Highlights strict enforcement of compliance with federal funding requirements within Title 1725 framework.
Practical Implications
For Local Governments: Must comply with detailed urban planning and public participation requirements when managing federally funded projects.
For State Agencies: Responsible for coordinating federal programs, monitoring compliance, and enforcing regulations.
For Citizens and Property Owners: Title 1725 provides mechanisms to ensure transparency and fairness in urban planning decisions.
For Federal Program Recipients: Strict adherence to reporting, auditing, and fund use guidelines is mandatory to avoid penalties.
Summary
Tennessee Title 1725 governs urban planning, federal program administration, and coordination of urban affairs.
It ensures local and state compliance with urban development goals and federal funding requirements.
Courts have upheld these regulations while emphasizing procedural fairness and strict compliance.
Title 1725 facilitates responsible urban growth and effective use of federal resources in Tennessee.
RELATED Blog
0 comments