Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 650 - Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology
📘 Overview: Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 650 – Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (OCAST)
Title 650 of the Oklahoma Administrative Code outlines the administrative rules governing the Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology (OCAST). OCAST is a state agency established to foster innovation, research, technology transfer, and economic development across Oklahoma.
Its mission is to support scientific and technological progress by:
Funding research and development (R&D) initiatives,
Encouraging public-private partnerships,
Supporting commercialization of technology,
Promoting STEM education and workforce development.
🏛️ Legal Authority and Structure
OCAST was created under the Oklahoma Science and Technology Research and Development Act (Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes).
Title 650 provides the regulatory structure for how OCAST implements its statutory mandates, including grant programs, administrative procedures, and oversight mechanisms.
The OCAST Board of Directors governs the agency and approves policies, rules, and funding awards.
🔑 Key Regulatory Areas Under Title 650
1. Research Funding and Grant Programs
OCAST administers several competitive programs, and Title 650 outlines eligibility criteria, application procedures, and evaluation methods. Major programs include:
Health Research Program – funds biomedical and clinical research.
Oklahoma Applied Research Support (OARS) – supports tech development with commercial potential.
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)/Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) support.
Intern Partnerships – provides grants to place students in STEM-related internships.
Rules specify:
Application deadlines and formats,
Peer review processes,
Matching fund requirements,
Reporting obligations post-award.
2. Technology Commercialization and Transfer
OCAST promotes commercialization of innovations developed in Oklahoma through R&D grants or university research.
Title 650 includes rules on:
Intellectual property rights,
Licensing terms,
Metrics for commercialization success,
Support services for startups and entrepreneurs.
3. STEM Workforce Development and Internships
Rules establish internship partnership grants between educational institutions and private sector employers.
Eligibility and funding criteria are detailed, including:
Student qualifications,
Employer responsibilities,
Reimbursement caps,
Program goals (e.g., retaining STEM talent in Oklahoma).
4. Administrative Hearings and Appeals
Title 650 outlines procedures for challenging funding decisions, such as denied applications or grant terminations.
Affected parties are entitled to:
Notice of decision,
Right to request a hearing,
Review by administrative law judges,
Final action by the OCAST Board.
5. Oversight, Audits, and Compliance
Award recipients must submit:
Progress reports,
Final project reports,
Financial documentation.
OCAST is authorized to conduct audits and revoke or suspend funding in cases of:
Fraud,
Misuse of funds,
Failure to meet milestones.
⚖️ Legal Principles and Case Law Context
Though specific reported court cases involving OCAST are rare, legal principles from administrative law and public funding cases still apply.
1. Administrative Law – Due Process and Fairness
Since OCAST is a state agency, its decisions are subject to Oklahoma’s Administrative Procedures Act.
Applicants have a property interest in fair consideration of their applications.
Courts require that decisions on grants and funding be non-arbitrary, based on rules, and offer procedural safeguards when denied.
Hypothetical Case Example:
InnovateOK v. OCAST
Issue: Small business challenges denial of OARS funding.
Holding: Administrative law judge upholds OCAST’s decision, finding peer review process was properly followed and criteria applied consistently.
2. Contract Law – Grant Agreements
Once awarded, grants are governed by binding agreements. Breach of terms (e.g., failure to meet reporting obligations or improper use of funds) may result in:
Contract termination,
Return of funds,
Legal remedies.
Hypothetical Case Example:
MedTech Research v. OCAST
Issue: Dispute over IP ownership arising from state-funded research.
Outcome: Court interprets grant agreement and finds IP terms enforceable; OCAST retains commercialization rights per funding conditions.
3. Government Accountability and Audits
OCAST is audited by the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector.
Misuse of funds by grantees can trigger investigations and recovery efforts.
If wrongdoing is discovered, administrative or even criminal proceedings can follow.
📊 Summary Table
| Regulatory Area | Key Elements | Legal Principles |
|---|---|---|
| Research Funding | Competitive grants, peer review, matching funds | Fairness in funding, administrative law |
| Commercialization | IP rights, licensing, tech transfer assistance | Contract law, public funding rules |
| Internships & Workforce Dev. | Student/employer eligibility, reporting, funding caps | Programmatic discretion, education policy |
| Appeals and Hearings | Right to appeal funding decisions, hearing procedures | Procedural due process |
| Oversight and Audits | Reporting, audits, sanctions for misuse of funds | Accountability, audit law |
✅ Conclusion
Oklahoma Administrative Code Title 650 provides a structured, legally sound framework for OCAST to fulfill its mission of advancing science and technology in the state. These rules ensure transparency, accountability, and strategic allocation of public funds toward innovation and economic development.
Legal oversight focuses on ensuring that grant procedures are fair, that recipients comply with funding terms, and that the agency acts within the bounds of administrative law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments