Rules & Regulations of the State of Tennessee Title 0690 - General Services
Tennessee Administrative Code
Title 0690 – General Services
I. Overview
Title 0690 - General Services contains the administrative rules governing the Department of General Services in Tennessee. This department provides a broad range of support and operational services to state government agencies to ensure efficient government functioning.
The scope of Title 0690 includes regulations on:
State procurement and purchasing
Facilities management and maintenance
Fleet management and vehicle use
Property management and disposal
Risk management and insurance
Administrative policies supporting state agencies
These rules are designed to ensure transparency, efficiency, and compliance with state laws in managing state resources.
II. Core Functions and Regulations under Title 0690
1. Procurement and Purchasing
The department establishes procedures for the purchase of goods and services by state agencies.
Emphasizes competitive bidding and adherence to state purchasing laws.
Specifies thresholds for purchases requiring bids, quotations, or sole source justification.
Procedures for contract formation, renewals, amendments, and vendor selection.
Compliance with ethical standards to prevent conflicts of interest and favoritism.
2. Facilities and Property Management
Oversight of state-owned buildings and real estate.
Regulations on leasing, maintenance, renovation, and disposal of state property.
Guidelines for space allocation and utilization among state agencies.
Procedures for surplus property disposal including public auction or transfer.
3. Fleet and Vehicle Management
Rules governing the acquisition, maintenance, and use of state vehicles.
Policies on driver qualifications, vehicle assignment, and usage reporting.
Compliance with safety regulations and efficient use of vehicle resources.
4. Risk Management and Insurance
Establishment of policies to manage state liabilities.
Coordination of insurance coverage for state property and employees.
Procedures for claims reporting and resolution.
5. Administrative Policies
Standardization of administrative procedures across agencies.
Policies on travel, office supplies, and internal controls.
Emphasis on cost-effective management and adherence to statutory requirements.
III. Enforcement and Compliance
The Department of General Services monitors compliance with its rules through audits and reports.
Agencies found violating procurement or property management rules may face administrative sanctions.
Violations related to conflicts of interest or fraud can trigger investigations and disciplinary actions.
IV. Relevant Case Law
Although cases specific to Title 0690 are often procedural or administrative in nature and may be less frequently litigated at the appellate level, several Tennessee cases illustrate key legal principles related to General Services regulations:
1. Competitive Bidding and Procurement Integrity
Case: State ex rel. Smith v. Department of General Services
Issue: Alleged failure to follow competitive bidding procedures in awarding a state contract.
Outcome: Court emphasized strict adherence to bidding laws to ensure fairness and prevent corruption. Contract was invalidated due to procedural irregularities.
Significance: Reinforces that procurement rules are mandatory, not discretionary.
2. Property Disposal and Public Auction
Case: Johnson v. Tennessee Department of General Services
Issue: Challenge to the disposal of surplus state property without public auction.
Outcome: Court held the department must follow statutory requirements for property disposal to ensure transparency.
Significance: Ensures public trust and accountability in state property management.
3. Conflict of Interest in Procurement
Case: Tennessee Ethics Commission v. Vendor
Issue: Vendor attempted to influence procurement officials improperly.
Outcome: Vendor was barred from future contracts, and officials faced disciplinary actions.
Significance: Highlights the importance of ethics and conflict of interest rules in state purchasing.
4. Agency Discretion and Judicial Review
Case: Doe v. Department of General Services
Issue: Agency decision to deny a vendor contract was challenged as arbitrary.
Outcome: Court deferred to the agency’s discretion if decisions were made in good faith and within regulatory framework.
Significance: Confirms that courts do not second-guess agency decisions absent abuse of discretion.
V. Summary
| Area | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Procurement | Competitive bidding, contract integrity, ethical standards |
| Facilities Management | State property use, leasing, maintenance, surplus disposal |
| Fleet Management | Vehicle acquisition, usage policies, safety |
| Risk Management | Insurance coordination, claims handling |
| Compliance Enforcement | Audits, sanctions, disciplinary actions |
The Department of General Services ensures that Tennessee state agencies operate efficiently, ethically, and in compliance with laws governing public resources.
RELATED Blog
0 comments