Utah Administrative Code Topic - Governor
Topic: Governor — Explanation in Detail
In the context of the Utah Administrative Code, the Governor of Utah plays a critical role in the administrative law process. Although the Governor does not directly write administrative rules, the Governor has significant executive oversight, appointment powers, emergency authority, and veto power that shape how rules are made and enforced.
1. Governor’s Role in the Administrative Rulemaking Process
a. Oversight and Supervision
The Governor oversees executive branch agencies, which are the primary entities responsible for promulgating administrative rules. The Governor ensures that these agencies are acting within their statutory authority and that their rules reflect the legislative intent and public interest.
b. Appointment Power
The Governor appoints directors of various administrative agencies and boards. These appointees are often responsible for rulemaking, enforcement, and interpretation of agency policy.
Example: The Governor appoints the Executive Director of the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, who then has the authority to issue rules related to public health.
c. Review of Administrative Rules
Under Utah law (e.g., Utah Code Title 63G, Chapter 3 — "Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act"), administrative rules are submitted to the Office of Administrative Rules. While the Governor does not approve each rule individually, the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget (GOMB) may review rules for economic and fiscal impact, especially significant or controversial ones.
d. Emergency Rulemaking
The Governor can play a direct role during a state of emergency by issuing executive orders that may suspend or modify administrative rules temporarily. This is especially relevant during natural disasters, pandemics, or public safety emergencies.
Statutory authority: Utah Code § 53-2a-204 allows the Governor to declare a state of emergency and issue executive orders that may override existing rules.
2. Case Law: Governor’s Authority in Administrative Law
Though there are limited published Utah cases that directly address the Governor’s role in administrative rulemaking, we can consider relevant principles established in Utah and broader state constitutional law.
Case Example: Carter v. Lehi City, 2012 UT 2
Summary: While not directly about the Governor, this case involved the delegation of legislative power to administrative bodies. The Utah Supreme Court held that delegation is permissible so long as there are clear standards and guidelines.
Relevance: Supports the principle that agencies under the Governor’s control must operate within clear legislative authority and cannot arbitrarily create rules. The Governor, therefore, ensures that his appointees operate within lawful bounds.
Case Example: Beaver County v. Utah State Tax Commission, 2000 UT 6
Summary: This case dealt with the Utah State Tax Commission’s administrative rule and whether it exceeded statutory authority.
Relevance: The decision emphasized the limits of administrative discretion and the need for rules to stay within legislative intent. Since the Tax Commission is an independent agency, the Governor’s appointment and oversight functions are key to ensuring compliance.
Case Example: Utah Chapter of Sierra Club v. Utah Air Quality Board, 2006 UT 74
Summary: Involved a challenge to administrative rules relating to air quality.
Relevance: Demonstrates that administrative rules can be challenged in court, especially if alleged to be arbitrary or capricious. The Governor’s executive oversight plays a preventive role in reducing legal risk by ensuring well-reasoned, evidence-based rules.
3. Executive Orders
The Governor frequently uses executive orders to direct agency actions, especially in emergencies or policy transitions. While not part of the Administrative Code, they can affect or supersede existing administrative rules temporarily.
Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Gary Herbert and later Governor Spencer Cox issued several executive orders affecting health regulations, education rules, and business operations.
These actions impacted administrative agencies directly, prompting emergency rulemaking under the Governor’s directive.
4. Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act (UARA)
The Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, codified in Utah Code Title 63G, Chapter 3, provides the legal framework for creating administrative rules. The Governor’s role is mostly indirect under this act but still significant through:
Fiscal impact reviews
Executive direction
Personnel appointments
Emergency declarations
Conclusion
The Governor of Utah holds a powerful, albeit indirect, role in shaping the Utah Administrative Code. While not drafting rules, the Governor exerts influence through:
Appointment of agency heads
Budgetary control and review
Emergency powers
Oversight through executive orders and policy directives
Case law confirms that administrative agencies must stay within legislative authority, and the Governor’s oversight helps ensure they do. This balance of power ensures that Utah’s administrative rules remain legal, efficient, and accountable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments