Proclaimed Offenders In Crpc
1. What is a Proclaimed Offender?
A Proclaimed Offender is a person who is accused of a crime but deliberately avoids arrest by evading the process of law despite summons or warrants issued against them.
2. Relevant Legal Provisions
Section 82 of CrPC — Court can order a person to be proclaimed as an offender if they abscond or conceal themselves to avoid arrest.
Section 83 of CrPC — Procedure for proclamation of offender, publication of notice.
Section 84 of CrPC — Power to attach and sell property of proclaimed offender.
Section 85 of CrPC — Arrest and detention of proclaimed offenders found within jurisdiction.
Section 86 of CrPC — If the proclaimed offender is arrested or surrendered, they must be produced before the magistrate.
3. Purpose of Proclamation
The idea is to bring to book those who intentionally avoid legal proceedings to frustrate the trial or investigation. This mechanism compels their appearance or allows the court to take action against their properties.
4. Detailed Case Law Analysis on Proclaimed Offenders
Case 1: Rameshchandra Pandurang Mane v. State of Maharashtra (1968)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Key Issue: Whether proclamation of offender under Section 82 CrPC is mandatory or discretionary.
Facts:
The accused was absconding, and the court initiated proceedings under Section 82 CrPC.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that proclamation under Section 82 is mandatory once it is established that the accused is evading arrest and is intentionally concealing themselves.
Significance:
It clarified the mandatory nature of the proclamation, reinforcing that courts should act promptly to avoid undue delay in criminal proceedings.
Case 2: K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1967)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Key Issue: Validity of proclamation when accused cannot be found.
Facts:
The accused could not be located despite reasonable efforts.
Judgment:
The Court held that a proclamation can be issued even if the accused’s whereabouts are unknown and emphasized the procedural safeguards to be observed (e.g., publicity, reasonable search).
Significance:
Established that a proclamation is a legal tool even when the accused is elusive.
Case 3: State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1963)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Key Issue: Proclamation without proper search and inquiry.
Facts:
Proclamation was issued without proper attempts to locate the accused.
Judgment:
The court invalidated the proclamation for lack of due diligence in searching for the accused.
Significance:
Emphasized the importance of reasonable efforts and due diligence before issuing a proclamation.
Case 4: Gurnam Singh v. State of Punjab (1967)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Key Issue: Effect of proclamation on accused’s right to be tried.
Facts:
The accused was proclaimed and later arrested.
Judgment:
The Court held that proclamation does not affect the right of the accused to a fair trial, and they must be produced before the court to face proceedings.
Significance:
Reaffirmed that proclamation is a procedural step and cannot override fundamental rights.
Case 5: Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (2005)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Key Issue: Attaching properties of proclaimed offenders under Section 84 CrPC.
Facts:
Properties of the proclaimed offender were attached by the government.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that attachment of properties is permissible but must be done following due process and the right of the accused to challenge such attachment once arrested.
Significance:
Balanced the government’s powers and accused’s rights, ensuring due process.
Case 6: Dilawar Singh v. State of Haryana (2009)
Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Key Issue: Proclamation proceedings when accused appears voluntarily.
Facts:
Accused proclaimed under Section 82 CrPC appeared voluntarily.
Judgment:
Court held that once the accused appears, the proclamation proceedings stand abated, and normal trial procedure must continue.
Significance:
Ensures proclamation does not prejudice accused who comes forward voluntarily.
5. Procedure for Proclamation (Summary)
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Initiation | Court orders proclamation under Section 82 when accused absconds. |
| Publication | Notice of proclamation published in newspapers and conspicuous places under Section 83. |
| Time frame | Reasonable time given for accused to appear (usually 30 days). |
| Attachment | If accused fails to appear, their property may be attached/sold (Section 84). |
| Arrest | If found, police can arrest the proclaimed offender (Section 85). |
| Production | Accused must be produced before the magistrate (Section 86). |
6. Key Points & Practical Implications
Proclamation is a powerful tool to prevent misuse of legal process by absconding accused.
Courts must exercise due diligence before proclamation.
Proclaimed offender loses some procedural safeguards (like anticipatory bail).
Property attachment serves as a coercive measure.
Proclamation does not deprive the accused of right to fair trial.
If the accused appears voluntarily after proclamation, the case proceeds normally.
7. Conclusion
The concept of proclaimed offenders under the CrPC is crucial in criminal justice to ensure that accused persons cannot frustrate the legal process by hiding or evading arrest. Courts have consistently emphasized the mandatory nature of proclamation, fair procedure, and balancing of state power with individual rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments