Role of Election Commission in Model Code Violations
- ByAdmin --
- 26 May 2025 --
- 0 Comments
The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is a set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to regulate political parties and candidates during elections, aiming to ensure free, fair, and ethical electoral contests. While the MCC itself is not a statute, the Election Commission derives its authority from the Constitution and various laws to enforce the code and act against violations. This article explores the crucial role of the ECI in monitoring, investigating, and penalizing breaches of the MCC, highlighting its legal basis, powers, challenges, and recent developments.
Legal Basis of the Model Code of Conduct
- Non-Statutory Nature: The MCC is a voluntary code formulated by the ECI in 1960 to promote fair election practices. Though it lacks statutory backing, it holds significant moral and constitutional weight.
- Constitutional Authority of the ECI:
- Article 324 of the Constitution empowers the ECI to conduct free and fair elections and take necessary steps to ensure this objective.
- This broad supervisory power includes enforcing the MCC to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
- Article 324 of the Constitution empowers the ECI to conduct free and fair elections and take necessary steps to ensure this objective.
- Relevant Statutes:
- Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides legal grounds for ECI’s actions against corrupt practices and election offenses.
- Sections like Section 123 define corrupt practices, enabling action where MCC violations overlap with these offenses.
- Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides legal grounds for ECI’s actions against corrupt practices and election offenses.
Functions and Powers of the Election Commission Regarding MCC Violations
- Monitoring Compliance: The ECI continuously monitors campaign activities, speeches, advertisements, and social media to detect MCC violations.
- Issuing Notices and Warnings: On detecting a violation, the ECI issues warnings or showcause notices to the offending party or candidate.
- Ordering Removal or Correction: The Commission can direct removal of offending material, such as defamatory ads or provocative speeches.
- Advising Political Parties: ECI engages with party leaders to ensure compliance, emphasizing the code’s ethical imperatives.
- Imposing Penalties: While the MCC itself does not prescribe penalties, violations may be treated as electoral offenses under the Representation of the People Act, leading to:
- Cancellation of candidatures.
- Rejection of election results in extreme cases.
- Referral to police or prosecution for criminal charges.
- Cancellation of candidatures.
- Use of Technology: The ECI employs surveillance tools, including social media monitoring and complaint portals, to track and investigate MCC breaches.
Challenges Faced by the Election Commission
- Non-Statutory Nature Limits Enforcement: Since MCC is not law, ECI relies on moral authority and political pressure, which sometimes limits strict enforcement.
- Political Pushback: Parties often challenge ECI notices or defy directions, leading to legal battles and enforcement delays.
- Volume of Complaints: During elections, the sheer number of reported violations strains ECI’s resources and slows response times.
- Balancing Free Speech and Regulation: ECI must tread carefully to regulate speech without infringing constitutional rights under Article 19(1)(a).
Recent Developments and Judicial Support
- Supreme Court Endorsements: The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld ECI’s powers to enforce the MCC and maintain election purity. In Common Cause vs. Union of India (2018), the Court emphasized the importance of MCC for credible elections.
- Stricter Enforcement in 2024 Elections: The ECI adopted a zero-tolerance policy on hate speech, fake news, and misuse of official machinery, issuing show-cause notices and censoring content swiftly.
- Use of Social Media Guidelines: Recognizing digital media’s influence, ECI issued detailed guidelines for social media conduct by candidates and parties, penalizing violations to uphold MCC standards.
Important Sections and Articles for Reference
- Article 324 of the Constitution: Empowers ECI to conduct and regulate elections and enforce the MCC.
- Representation of the People Act, 1951:
- Section 123: Defines corrupt practices such as bribery and undue influence overlapping with MCC breaches.
- Section 125A: Punishment for bribery or undue influence.
- Section 126: Prohibits election propaganda on polling day, often enforced under MCC.
- Supreme Court Judgments:
- Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) recognized ECI’s expanded powers.
- Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) reinforced ECI’s role in MCC enforcement.
- Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (2002) recognized ECI’s expanded powers.
Recommendations to Strengthen ECI’s Role
- Statutory Backing for MCC: Legislative support can provide clear penalties and enforcement mechanisms, empowering ECI further.
- Enhanced Technological Infrastructure: Investment in AI-driven monitoring tools to handle voluminous complaints and social media surveillance.
- Increased Autonomy and Resources: More budget and administrative autonomy can strengthen ECI’s enforcement capacity.
- Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating voters and political actors about MCC importance to build compliance culture.
Conclusion
The Election Commission of India plays a pivotal role in upholding democratic values by enforcing the Model Code of Conduct during elections. Despite challenges due to the MCC’s non-statutory nature, the ECI has asserted its authority through vigilant monitoring, timely interventions, and leveraging constitutional powers. Recent judicial support and adoption of technology indicate a proactive approach to preserving election integrity. Strengthening legal frameworks and resources will further empower the ECI to curb MCC violations, ensuring free, fair, and ethical elections in the world’s largest democracy.
RELATED Blog
0 comments