Law of Evidence at Zimbabwe
The Law of Evidence in Zimbabwe is governed by a combination of statutory law and common law principles, as well as judicial precedents that shape how evidence is handled in both civil and criminal proceedings. The law surrounding evidence in Zimbabwe is mainly derived from the Evidence Act [Chapter 8:01], which codifies the rules regarding the presentation and use of evidence in courts.
Key Aspects of the Law of Evidence in Zimbabwe:
Types of Evidence:
Oral Evidence: Testimonies given by witnesses who are under oath. These are considered crucial in both civil and criminal trials.
Documentary Evidence: Written records, such as contracts, letters, electronic communications, and other documents that are relevant to the case.
Real Evidence: Physical objects or materials presented to the court, such as weapons, clothing, or other tangible items.
Expert Evidence: Testimonies provided by individuals with specialized knowledge, such as medical experts or forensic experts, to explain technical matters.
Circumstantial Evidence: Indirect evidence that allows a conclusion to be drawn from the facts and circumstances surrounding a case.
Admissibility of Evidence:
Relevance: Evidence must be directly relevant to the issues at hand in the case. Irrelevant evidence is excluded.
Legally Obtained Evidence: Evidence must be lawfully obtained. Evidence gathered through illegal means, such as without a warrant, is inadmissible unless its inclusion is in the interests of justice.
Hearsay Evidence: Hearsay (testimony about statements made outside of court) is generally inadmissible under Zimbabwean law. However, there are several exceptions where hearsay may be allowed, particularly when the declarant is unavailable, or the statement was made in circumstances where the reliability of the statement can be verified.
Burden of Proof:
Civil Cases: In civil cases, the burden of proof is typically on the party making the claim. The standard of proof is “preponderance of the evidence” or “balance of probabilities” — meaning it is more likely than not that the claim is true.
Criminal Cases: In criminal cases, the prosecution carries the burden of proof and must prove the defendant's guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt". The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle, and the accused does not have to prove their innocence.
Witness Testimony:
Witnesses are required to give testimony under oath or affirmation. A witness's statement can be cross-examined by the opposing party.
Witnesses can be compelled to testify in Zimbabwe, and failure to do so may result in legal consequences. However, certain categories of witnesses may have privileges, such as spousal privilege (where spouses cannot be forced to testify against each other) and professional privilege (such as solicitor-client privilege).
Expert Evidence:
Expert witnesses are allowed to give specialized opinions on matters that fall outside the knowledge of the average person. For example, experts in fields like medicine, engineering, or forensic science can assist the court in understanding complex issues.
Expert testimony must be based on sound principles and methodologies, and experts are required to disclose the basis of their opinions.
Documentary Evidence:
Written documents can be submitted as evidence, provided they are relevant and authentic. Documents that are not contested can be admitted more easily, but if there is any doubt about their authenticity, they may require further verification.
Documents in foreign languages must be translated into English, as English is the official language of Zimbabwe’s courts.
Electronic evidence, such as emails, text messages, and data from electronic devices, is also admissible, provided it is authenticated and can be shown to be relevant.
The Hearsay Rule and Exceptions:
Hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible, meaning that statements made outside of court cannot be used to prove the truth of the matter asserted unless they meet specific exceptions. These exceptions include:
Statements made by a person who is unavailable to testify.
Statements made in the course of a person’s trade or profession.
Statements made by a deceased person under certain conditions.
Additionally, under Zimbabwean law, the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07] allows certain hearsay statements in criminal cases, especially when the declarant is unavailable or the statement has inherent reliability.
Privilege:
Legal Professional Privilege: Communications between an individual and their lawyer are protected from disclosure in court. This privilege is vital in ensuring that clients can seek legal advice freely and without fear that their communications will later be used against them in court.
Spousal Privilege: A person cannot be compelled to testify against their spouse in most cases, although this privilege may not apply if the spouse is a co-accused in a criminal case.
Exclusionary Rules:
Illegally Obtained Evidence: If evidence is obtained unlawfully (e.g., through unlawful search or seizure), it may be excluded from court. However, courts will still evaluate whether the evidence was obtained in violation of the rights of the accused and whether its exclusion would serve the interests of justice.
The Evidence Act [Chapter 8:01] provides that the court has discretion in determining the admissibility of such evidence, taking into account the seriousness of the violation.
Admissibility of Confessions:
Voluntary Confessions: In criminal cases, confessions made by an accused person are only admissible if they were made voluntarily. Confessions obtained through coercion, force, or threats are not admissible in court.
The Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07] outlines the rules regarding the admissibility of confessions and provides safeguards to prevent forced confessions.
Rules of Evidence in Criminal Trials:
Exclusionary Rules: The court will often exclude evidence that has been obtained improperly or where the admission of such evidence would violate the rights of the accused.
Direct and Circumstantial Evidence: In criminal trials, evidence can be direct (e.g., a witness who directly saw the crime) or circumstantial (e.g., fingerprint evidence, DNA, or motive). Both types of evidence can contribute to a conviction.
Judicial Discretion:
In Zimbabwe, the court has significant discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence. Judges can exclude evidence they deem to be unfair, irrelevant, or prejudicial, as well as evidence that would violate the rights of a party to a fair trial.
The court also has discretion in deciding how evidence should be presented, including the order in which it is presented and the extent to which witness testimony or documents are introduced.
Key Statutes Governing Evidence in Zimbabwe:
The Evidence Act [Chapter 8:01]: This is the primary legislation governing the rules of evidence in Zimbabwe. It outlines how evidence is to be gathered, presented, and evaluated in court.
The Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07]: This law governs the rules of evidence specifically in criminal cases.
The Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]: This act sets out the substantive criminal law in Zimbabwe and also contains provisions related to the admissibility of certain types of evidence in criminal trials.
The High Court Rules and Magistrates Court Rules: These provide further procedural rules on the presentation of evidence in civil and criminal cases.
Conclusion:
The Law of Evidence in Zimbabwe is a combination of statutory law, common law, and judicial discretion. The Evidence Act [Chapter 8:01] and other related statutes provide a framework for ensuring that only relevant, lawful, and reliable evidence is used in legal proceedings. Zimbabwe's legal system emphasizes fairness, protection of rights, and the need to balance the probative value of evidence with its potential to prejudice or cause injustice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments