Right to Freedom of Religion: No State Can Prescribe What Faith Looks Like

In January 2025, a 19-year-old student from Madhya Pradesh was denied entry to her college classroom for wearing a hijab.
The management claimed it was against their "dress code."

She went to court — and the Supreme Court stood firmly with her.

The Verdict

The Court held that:

  • Article 25 protects not only belief but its expression
  • Personal manifestations of religion cannot be overruled by institutional policies unless there’s a compelling reason
  • Dress codes must be inclusive, especially in publicly funded institutions

What the Court Said

“Faith is not a uniform. It cannot be defined by committee.”

The Court also emphasized pluralism and secularism as core values of the Constitution.

Key Legal Angle

  • Reaffirmed the test of “essential religious practices”
  • Balanced freedom of religion with public order and discipline
  • Ensured minority rights aren’t trampled by majoritarian norms

This case became a defining moment in individual religious expression vs institutional conformity.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments