Law of Evidence at Western Sahara
Western Sahara's legal framework is complex and influenced by its disputed status and the involvement of multiple governing entities. The region's legal systems are shaped by Moroccan law, the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), and international legal principles.
⚖️ Legal Systems in Western Sahara
1. Moroccan Legal System
Since Morocco's annexation of Western Sahara in 1975, Moroccan law has been applied in the territory. This includes the Moroccan Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, which govern criminal trials and evidence handling. However, the application of these laws has been controversial, especially concerning the treatment of Sahrawi activists. (Morocco/Western Sahara: Fair Trials Elusive | Human Rights Watch)
Human rights organizations have reported that Moroccan courts often rely on confessions obtained under duress or torture. For instance, in the 2013 Gdeim Izik case, convictions were based on confessions that defendants claimed were extracted through torture. The Court of Cassation later voided the military court verdict due to inconclusive evidence, and the case was referred to a civilian court. However, the civilian court also admitted disputed confessions into evidence, leading to criticism from international bodies . (Morocco High Court Reviewing Key Western Sahara Case - Amnesty International, Morocco/Western Sahara: Dubious Confessions, Tainted Trials | Human Rights Watch, Western Sahara: Long-Term Prisoners Await Justice | Human Rights Watch)
2. Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) Legal System
The SADR, proclaimed by the Polisario Front in 1976, operates a legal system based on its constitution, which includes provisions for the separation of powers and the protection of individual rights . However, the SADR's jurisdiction is limited to refugee camps and areas under its control, primarily in Algeria, and does not extend to the territories under Moroccan administration. (Constitution of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic)
🧾 Evidence Handling in Legal Proceedings
1. Moroccan Courts
In Moroccan courts, evidence is governed by the Moroccan Code of Criminal Procedure. However, the use of confessions obtained under torture remains a significant issue. Despite legal prohibitions against such practices, reports indicate that courts often fail to adequately investigate allegations of torture, leading to the admission of coerced confessions as evidence . (Morocco/Western Sahara: Dubious Confessions, Tainted Trials | Human Rights Watch)
2. SADR Legal Framework
The SADR's legal framework emphasizes the protection of individual rights and the prohibition of torture. However, due to its limited territorial control, the practical application of these legal standards is constrained. The SADR's constitution provides for the right to a fair trial and the protection of personal freedoms, but these rights are primarily upheld within the refugee camps and areas under SADR control . (Constitution of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic)
⚠️ Challenges and Criticisms
Use of Torture in Evidence Gathering: There is widespread concern over the use of torture to extract confessions in Moroccan-administered areas of Western Sahara. International human rights organizations have documented numerous cases where defendants allege that their confessions were obtained under duress, yet these confessions are still used as primary evidence in trials . (Morocco/Western Sahara: Dubious Confessions, Tainted Trials | Human Rights Watch)
Limited Jurisdiction of SADR: The SADR's legal authority is limited to areas under its control, primarily outside Western Sahara. As a result, its ability to enforce legal standards and protect the rights of Sahrawi individuals within the disputed territory is significantly restricted.
In summary, Western Sahara's legal landscape is characterized by a dual system influenced by Moroccan law and the SADR's legal framework. The handling of evidence, particularly concerning confessions, remains a contentious issue, with concerns over the use of torture and the limited jurisdiction of the SADR complicating the pursuit of justice in the region.
RELATED Blog
0 comments